Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Knowledge Mapping of Peri-Urban Areas: Network Analysis of Concepts and Identification of Future Research Directions

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Said Jamaldin University of Asadabadi, Asadabad,, Iran.
10.22034/jpusd.2025.535550.1355
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Today, urban areas have emerged as one of the most dynamic, challenging, and at the same time, opportunity-creating geographical spaces. Rapid urbanization, climate change, epidemics, and increasing pressure on natural and environmental assets have made attention to periurban spaces an inevitable necessity. However, the existing knowledge in this field is scattered and lacks an integrated and coherent framework. By mapping periurban knowledge, the present study will provide a comprehensive, objective, and dynamic picture of existing research, and pave the way for identifying emerging clusters and research gaps and defining interdisciplinary research. The innovation of the present study is that it is considered the first systematic attempt to visually represent and network analyze global periurban knowledge with a quantitative-network approach and by using specialized software VOSviewer, which provides a new framework for guiding future research.
Methodology
The present study is an applied research in terms of its purpose, qualitative in nature, and analytical bibliometrics in terms of its method with a network analysis approach. The research data were extracted using a structured search in the Scopus scientific database, and in this regard, keywords such as "peri-urban" OR "periurban" OR "peri urban" OR "urban fringe" OR "rural-urban fringe" OR "rural-urban interface" were searched. In fact, the monitoring of resources was carried out using a systematic method in the Scopus scientific database. The search was carried out based on keywords related to peri-urban, in fields including title, abstract, and keywords. The time period of the present study is from 1987 to 2025, and only English-language resources indexed in Scopus were included in the research process. Data normalization was performed at the level of standardization of keywords and integration of different forms of a concept such as synonyms, singular/plural forms, etc. This process was performed using the internal potential of Vosviewer software. In the search process, 488 sources including articles, books, book chapters, conference papers and other documents were retrieved. All retrieved sources were downloaded as CSV or RIS files from Scopus and imported into VOSviewer software. After that, the data were processed for bibliometric analyses (co-authorship, co-occurrence, vocabulary density and temporal analysis). Therefore, the present method ensures that the present research is based on transparent, reproducible data and is based on a valid international scientific database.
Results and discussion
According to the research results, the conceptual evolution of peri-urbanism has been in seven stages including 2010-1987; 2010-2012; 2012-2014; 2014-2016; 2016-2018; 2018-2020 and 2024-2020. Since 2020, the focus has been on concepts such as carbon, food supply, smart systems, biochemical oxygen demand, energy efficiency, urban forests, peri-urban agriculture, open data, smart city, Covid-19, land management, land tenure, management approach, rural, healthcare policymaking, urban design, perception, urban context, urban sprawl, awareness, ecosystem and self-efficacy. The main finding of the co-occurrence analysis of the vocabulary is the identification of 13 conceptual clusters and revealing the diversity and breadth of the peri-urban domain, as well as the strong emphasis on the concepts of urban planning, sustainable development and the importance of the urban area. The combination of co-occurrence analysis and vocabulary density mapping, while identifying frequent words, indicates that the peri-urban domain is evolving and evolving in interaction with concepts such as smart city, peri-urban agriculture, urban ecosystem, land management and urban health. The outcome of the present study is based on identifying emerging fields such as urban agriculture, urban smartization and response to crises such as COVID-19 and has highlighted knowledge gaps in this field, especially the integration of peri-urban with land, health and open data policies. These findings pave the way for the design of future research focusing on sustainable and resilient peri-urban areas.
Conclusion
By comprehensively analyzing the co-occurrence maps, temporal evolution, and density of peri-urban vocabulary, the research findings revealed profound and fundamental transformations in this concept, rooted in the inherent dynamics of peri-urban areas as urban-rural transition spaces and responses to social, economic, environmental, and technological challenges. In the period 1987-2010, research focused mainly on technical and infrastructural dimensions such as water, waste, and sanitation management, but after 2010, a multidimensional, systemic, and human-centered approach replaced the unidimensional perspective. This new trend is in line with theoretical developments toward spatial justice, participatory governance, and people-centered planning, and is also confirmed by the recurrence of keywords such as “human,” “social justice,” and “land tenure.” In 2020-2024, peri-urban areas played an active and strategic role in the face of global crises—including COVID-19, climate change, and food insecurity—and emerged as the frontline in confronting these crises. This finding is consistent with theories of urban resilience. At the same time, the introduction of digital technologies, open data, and remote sensing has linked peri-urban areas to the era of smart and data-driven cities. This development is in line with the theories of sustainable smart city, green city, and smart governance. The analysis of 13 keyword clusters shows that peri-urban areas today are an integrated space between the city and the countryside, where ecological, socio-cultural, economic, and governance linkages are materialized. This development has been shaped by theoretical perspectives such as rural-urban and multifunctional perspectives. In summary, the present study, through quantitative and qualitative analysis, has clarified the conceptual developments of peri-urban areas and provided a theoretical-practical framework for future research. This framework is based on foundations such as human-centeredness, ecological-social-economic sustainability, smartization, and spatial justice, and will pave the way for transforming peri-urban areas into dynamic, strategic spaces and the beating heart of sustainable and smart development.
Funding
According to the responsible author, this article has no financial support
 
Authors Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
Keywords
Subjects

Ahani, S., & Dadashpoor, D .(2021). A review of domains, approaches, methods and indicators in peri-urbanization literature. Habitat International, 114(2021), 102387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102387.
AmirEntekhabi, S., Javan, F., Farhad, and HassaniMoghadam, H. (2018). Analysis of the effects of urban sprawl on the instability of rural settlements: A case study of Rezvanshahr County. Geographical Land Engineering, 2(3), 59–71. (In Persian)
Barbosa, V., Pradilla, M. M. S., & Rajendran, L. P. (2022). Peri-urbanization, dynamics, and challenges in developing countries towards sustainable urban growth – Special Section Editorial. urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, v.14, e20220998. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.014.e20220998
Colleoni, M. (2019). Peri Urbanization The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, (pp. 1–5).
Davoudi, S., & Stead, D. (2002). Urban-rural relationships: An introduction and a brief history. Built Environ, 28(2002), 269–277. DOI:10.2307/23287748.
Edwards, M. (1991). About fragmentation in the urban context. Architecture & Comportement, 7(4), 339-359. B2n.ir/zm1605.
Elhadary, Y. A. E., Samat, N., & Obeng-Odoom, F .(2013). Development at the Peri-Urban Area and Its Impact on Agricultural Activities: An Example from the Seberang Perai Region, Penang State, Malaysia. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37(7), 834-856. DOI: 10.1080/21683565.2013.797950
Follmann, A. (2022). Geographies of peri-urbanization in the global south. Geography Compass, 16(7), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12650.
Follmann, A., Hartmann, G., & Dannenberg, P. (2018). Multi-temporal transect analysis of peri-urban developments in Faridabad, India. Journal of Maps, 14(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2018.1424656
Forsyth, A. (2012). Defining Suburbs. Journal of Planning Literature, 27(3), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412212448101.
Friedmann, J. (2016). The future of periurban research. Cities, 53, 163–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.009.
Gottero, E. (Ed.) (2019). Agrourbanism. In Tools for Governance and Planning of Agrarian Landscape. GeoJournal Library; Springer: Cham, Switzerland.
Gottero, E., Larcher, F., Cassatella, C. (2023). Defining and Regulating Peri-Urban Areas through a Landscape Planning Approach: The Case Study of Turin Metropolitan Area (Italy). Land , 12(2023), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/ land12010217.
Harris, R., & Vorms, C. (2017). Introduction. In R. Harris, & C. Vorms (Eds.), What's in a name?: Talking about urban peripheries. (pp. 3-35). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781442620643-003.
Inostroza, L., Baur, R., & Csaplovics, E. (2013). Urban sprawl and fragmentation in Latin America: a dynamic quantification and characterization of spatial patterns. Journal of Environmental Management, 115(2013), 87-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.007. PMid:23246769.
Maffini, A. L., & Maraschin, C. (2018). Urban segregation and socio-spatial interactions: a configurational approach. Urban Science, 2(3), 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2030055.
Narain, V., & Nischal, S .(2007). The peri-urban interface in Shahpur Khurd and Karnera, India. Environment and Urbanization, 19(1), 261-273. DOI:10.1177/0956247807076905.
Nasiri Hendeh Khaleh, E., Javan, F. and Younesi Sandi, R. (2022). Investigating the effects of urban creep of Anzali port on the changes or physical-spatial stability of peri-urban settlements. Village and Space Sustainable Development, 3(4), 82-98. doi: 10.22077/vssd.2022.5475.1118(In Persian)
Rahimi, H., Behzadfar, M., & Abdollahzadeh Taraf, A .(2024). Recognizing the theory of sustainable urban design in peri-urban areas. Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl, 15 (8), 181–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2023.31250.4594.
Rajendran, L. P., Raúl, L., Chen, M., Andrade, J.C. G., Akhtar, R., Mngumi, L. E., Chander, S., Srinivas, S., & Ro, M. R .(2024). The ‘peri-urban turn’: A systems thinking approach for a paradigm shift in reconceptualising urban-rural futures in the global South. Habitat International,146(2024), 103041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103041.
Ravetz, J., Fertner, C., & Nielsen, T. S. (2013). The dynamics of peri-urbanization. In Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe (pp. 13–44). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0_2.
Salem, M., Ravetz, J., Sareen, S., Dong, T., Haque, M., Bayoumi, W., Tsurusaki, N., & Xu, G .(2025). Managing the urban-rural transition: A review of approaches and policies for peri-urban land use. Journal of Urban Management, xxx (xxxx) xxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2025.04.006.
Samat, N., Hasni, R., & Elhadary, Y. A. E. (2011). Modelling Land Use Changes at the Peri-Urban Areas Using Geographic Information Systems and Cellular Automata Model. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4 (6), 72-84. DOI:10.5539/jsd.v4n6p72.
Sieverts, T. (2003). Cities without Cities: An Interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. Spon Press Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK.
Simon, D. (2008). Urban environments: Issues on the peri-urban fringe. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.environ.33.021407.093240­.
Simon, D. (2020). Peri-urbanization. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures. (1-5). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7
Surya, B. (2016). The Processes Analysis of Urbanization, Spatial Articulation, Social Change and Social Capital Difference in the Dynamics of New Town Development in the Fringe Area of Makassar City (Case Study: In Metro Tanjung Bunga Area, Makassar City). Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci, 227(2016), 216–231. DOI:10.24297/jssr.v7i1.6633.
Tacoli, C. (1997). Rural-urban interactions: A guide to the literature. Environment and Urbanization, 10(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789801000105/ ASSET/095624789801000105.FP.PNG_V03
Thuo, A. D. M .(2013). Impacts Of Urbanization On Land Use Planning, Livelihood And Environment In The Nairobi Rural-Urban Fringe, Kenya. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2, 70–79. B2n.ir/gr9881.
Varkey, A. M., & Manasi, S .(2019). A Review of Peri-Urban Definitions, Land Use Changes and Challenges to Development. Urban India, 39 (I), 96-111. B2n.ir/pk6477.
Vejre, H., Eiter, S., Hernandez-Jimenez, V., Lohrberg, F., Loupa-Ramos, I., Recasens, X., Pickard, D., Scazzosi, L., & Simon-Rojo, M. (2016). Can agriculture be Urban? In Urban Agriculture Europe. Lohrberg, F., Licka, L., Scazzosi, L., Timpe, A., Eds.; Jovis Verlag: Berlin, Germany, pp. 18–21.
Wolff, S., Mdemu, M., & Lakes, T. (2021). Defining the Peri-Urban: A Multidimensional Characterization of Spatio-Temporal Land Use along an Urban−Rural Gradient in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Land, 10(2), https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020177.
Yao, Z., & Tian, L. (2020). How did collectivity retention affect land use transformation in peri-urban areas of China? A case of panyu, guangzhou. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2020.08.009.
Zasada, I. (2011). Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture-A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008.
Zhao, P. (2012). Urban-rural transition in China's metropolises: New trends in peri-urbanisation in Beijing. International Development Planning Review, 34(3), 269–294.  https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2012.20.
Zhu, J. (2013). Governance over land development during rapid urbanization under institutional uncertainty, with reference to periurbanization in Guangzhou metropolitan region. China. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11309.