Explaining the Habitability of Rural Settlements Around the Metropolis of Rasht

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D in Geography & rural planning, Rsht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht. Iran

2 P.hd

3 professor of Department of Geography, Rsht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht. Iran

Abstract

The livability mean is the power and ability of a place to meet the living needs of residents including material or immaterial to improve the quality of life and creating an appropriate environment for the prosperity of residents which is hidden in the sense of people's satisfaction from their living environment and it is an introduction to sustainability and improving the quality of life. Today its evaluating has attracted enormous interest in the field of planning and policy of rural settlements. The purpose of this study is determine the level of rural settlements based on the indices of livability in the villages around the metropolis of Rasht. Livability levels are determined based on relevant indices. The type of research is practical and the used method is descriptive-analytic and the Copras technique is used for analyzing data and information. The findings show that the continuity and belonging to the place index has the highest and tourism index has the least impact on the livability of the studied villages. The results of the Copras technique shows that Alman and Pirkalachah villages have the best condition and Varazgah and Koleshtaleshan villages have the worst condition in the livability. Based on the percentage of the importance of the studied villages, those are located at five levels of livability including very desirable livability, desirable livability, moderate livability, undesirable livability and very undesirable livability. Results in research can be the reason for future plans and with knowing the priority of villages, proposed programs are more practical and in order to increase the welfare of residents.

Keywords

Main Subjects


خراسانی، محمدامین؛ رضوانی، محمدرضا و مطیعی لنگرودی، سید حسن؛ رفیعیان، مجتبی.1391. سنجش و ارزیابی زیست‌پذیری روستاهای پیرامون شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان ورامین)، فصلنامه پژوهش­های روستایی، 3 (4)، 110-85 .
خراسانی، محمدامین  و رضوانی، محمدرضا. 1392. سنجش و ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های زیست‌پذیری در سکونتگاه­های روستایی پیرامون شهری (بررسی موردی: شهرستان ورامین)، فصلنامه توسعه روستایی، 5 (1)، 110-89 .
خزاعی نژاد، فروغ. 1394. تحلیل زیست‌پذیری در بخش مرکزی شهر تهران موردپژوهش محله­های منطقه 12، رساله دکتری تخصصی، به راهنمایی محمد سلیمانی مهرنجانی، مشاور احمد زنگانه، سیمین تولایی، وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، دانشگاه خوارزمی، دانشکده علوم زمین.
ساسان­پور، فرزانه؛ تولایی، سیمین و جعفری اسدآبادی، حمزه. 1393. قابلیت زیست‌پذیری شهرها در راستای توسعه پایدار شهری (موردمطالعه: کلانشهر تهران)، جغرافیا (فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی و بین‌المللی جغرافیای ایران)، 12 (42)، 157-129.
ساسان پور، فرزانه؛ تولایی، سیمین و جعفری اسدآبادی، حمزه. 1394. سنجش و ارزیابی زیست‌پذیری شهری در مناطق بیست‌ودو­گانه کلانشهر تهران، فصلنامه برنامه­ریزی منطقه­ای، 5 (18)، 42-27.
سلیمانی مهرنجانی، محمد؛ تولایی، سیمین؛ رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ زنگانه، احمد و خزاعی نژاد، فروغی. 1395. زیست‌پذیری شهری: مفهوم، اصول، ابعاد و شاخص­ها، فصلنامه پژوهش­های جغرافیای برنامه­ریزی شهری، 4 (1)،  50-27.
علیزاده، سجاد. 1393. سنجش عوامل زیست‌پذیری با تأکید بر رویکرد مشارکت (مطالعه موردی: محله بریانک منطقه 10 شهرداری تهران)، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، به راهنمایی واراز مرادی مسیحی، استاد مشاور علیرضا بندرآباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشکده هنر و معماری.
عیسی لو، علی‌اصغر؛ بیات، مصطفی و بهرامی، عبدالعلی . 1392. انگاره زیست‌پذیری رهیافتی نوین جهت ارتقای کیفیت زندگی در جوامع روستایی (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان قم، بخش کهک)،  فصلنامه مسکن و محیط روستا، 146، 107-120.
Burden, D.و & Liman, T. 2011. America Needs Complete Streets. Ite journal, Aprill 2011,pp. 36-43.
Cedar Hill Municipality. 2008. City of Cedar Hill comprehensive Plan. livability, chapter 5 ,1-24.
Dunstan, Katie . 2007. Creating an Indicator of Liveability: The Neighbourhood Liveability Assessment Survey (NLAS) Paper prepared for European Urban Research Association (EURA) conference, 12-14 September, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 1-18.
Faiz, Asif, Faiz, Aysha, Wang, Wei, Bennett, Christopher.2012. Sustainable rural roads for livelihoods and livability. Journal Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 53, pp. 1-8.
Gough, Meghan Z. 2015. Reconciling Livability and Sustainability:Conceptual and Practical Implications for Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), 145- 160
Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz & Bahrami, Mohsen. 2014. Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(3), 534-553.
Kabir, Kadiri. 2006. Planning Sustainable and Livable cities in Nigeria. Research journal of social sciences, 1(1), 40-50.
Litman, Todd Alexander . 2011. Well measured: Developing indicators for sustainable and livable transport planning, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Madhuri, Bindu & Chandulal.J, Anand & Padmaja.M. 2010. Selection of Best Web Site by Applying COPRAS-G method. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 1(2) , 138-146.
Maghsoodi Tilaki, Mohammad Javad & Abdullah, Aldrin & Bahauddin, Azizi & Hedayati Marzbali, Massoomeh. 2014.The Necessity of Increasing Livability for George Town WorldHeritage Site: An Analytical Review. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Modern Applied Science, 8(1), 123-133.
Mahmoudi, Mohadeseh & Ahmad, Faizah & Abbasi, Bushra. 2015. Livable streets: The effects of physical problems on the quality and livability of Kuala Lumpur streets. Journal Cities, 43, 104–114.
McCormick, Mike & Gunby, Virginia & Houle, Dennie & Miles, Glenn & Fimia, Maggie & Richendrfer, Skye & Nourse-Madson, Sandra & Chaffee, Rebecca & Pittman, Leonard & Ziegler, Brian & Green, Tom & McCormick, Dave & Rose, Chris & Nye, Rosemary & Schaftlein, Shari .2017. Livable Communities Policy, The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), pp.1-7.
Mccrea, Rod. & Walters, Peter . 2012. Impacts of Urban Consolidation on Urban Liveability: Comparing an Inner and Outer Suburb in Brisbane, Australia. Jurnal Housing, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp 190-206.
Murphy, Brenda. 2010. Community Well-Being: An Overview of the Concept, Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, 6th Floor Toronto. Ontario M4T 2S3.Canada.
Podvezko, Valentinas. 2011.The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 2011, 22(2), 134-146.
Rue, Harrison & Rooney, Kathleen & Dock, Stephanie & Ange, Katharine & Twaddell, Hannah & Poncy, Amanda. 2011. The Role of FHWA Programs In Livability: State of the Practice Summary, Requested by U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
Song, yang . 2011. a livable city study in china: using structural Equation models. thesis submitted in statistics, department of statistics Uppsala university
Southworth, Michael. 2011. Measuring the livable city. Built Environment, 29(4), 343-354.
Thorin, Amanda . 2017. Livable Centers Study for the City of Mont Belvieu. RFP Number: TRN17-02, Houston-Galveston Area Council, pp. 1-26.
UPandey, R., & K Garg, Yogesh & Bharat, A.(2013. Understanding Qualitative Conceptions of Livability: Indian Perspective. international Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, eISSN:2319-1163, pISSN:2321-7308, pp.374- 380.
van Kamp, Irene & Leidelmeijer, Kees & Marsmana, Gooitske & de Hollander, Augustinus. 2003. Urban environmental quality and human well-being Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5-18
Victorian competition and efiiciency commission . 2008. A state of Liveability: An in inguir in to enhancing victoria’s Liveability, final report. Public Transport Users Association Inc, pp.1-45.
Wang, Xiaozhan . 2010.The research on the evaluation index system of livable of rural areas in China - by the case of rural areas in Henan Province. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 1, 456-461.