Spatial Development Model of Entrepreneurial Network of Settlements in Suburban Areas, Case: Mahidasht District, Kermanshah County

Moradi, Horieh

Spatial Development Model of Entrepreneurial Network of Settlements in Suburban Areas, Case: Mahidasht District, Kermanshah County

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Horieh Moradi

Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract

The dispersion of geographical phenomena and economic activities throughout rural areas under certain conditions makes it possible to form patterns. On the other hand, according to social scientists in spatial research, evaluating the local environment is as important in the success of an entrepreneurial company as economic and industrial evaluation. Therefore, the present article was designed with the aim of developing a spatial development model of rural rural entrepreneurship entrepreneurship residential network in Mahidasht district of Kermanshah city.The research method was applied and descriptive-analytical. Its statistical population consisted of a total of 7 entrepreneurial villages (30 entrepreneurial companies) in rural Pirashahr. On this basis, first, using SPSS20 software, the studied villages were leveled in terms of intensity and degree of entrepreneurship, and then, with the help of GIS software, the entrepreneurial residential network model was drawn. Findings showed that the rate of entrepreneurial activities in the study area was high from social and economic aspects; And rural suburban areas of this sector have the ability to develop space and accept new commercial companies and upgrade to a higher settlement hierarchy.Thus, according to the correlation results, the variables of social capital, environmental capital, growth of new companies, entrepreneurial capital in different production sectors, employment growth and entrepreneurial capital, respectively, positively correlate with the spatial development of the network of entrepreneurial settlements. And it has meaning and strong correlation. The situation of spatial development of rural suburban entrepreneurship in 60% of rural areas has a relatively favorable situation (degree of spatial development of entrepreneurship, 3.85) and has led to the level of growth of entrepreneurial economic activities in the region. The two villages of Simineh Olya and Dokushkan Hosseinkhani also had a high degree of entrepreneurial spatial development and played a key role in the development of suburban spaces in this section.

Keywords

20.1001.1.26764164.1400.3.2.8.4

Main Subjects

Economical

References

ایمنی، سیاوش.1387. کارآفرینی راهبردی نو در توسعه روستایی، نظام جامع اطلاعرسانی اشتغال، سازمان تجاریسازی فناوری و اشتغال دانشآموختگان.

جمشیدزهی شهبخش، امید و مرادی، حوریه .1399. تئوری بنیانی توسعه گردشگری روستایی گیلان (مورد مطالعه: بخش رحمتآباد و بلوکات شهرستان رودبار). پژوهش و برنامهریزی روستایی، 10 (1)، پیاپی 31، صص 99ـ81.

رفیعی، مهران، خطیبی، سیدمحمدرضا، داودپور، زهره .1399.تبیین مفهوم پیراشهری و عوامل مؤثر در ایجاد و توسعه آن، نشریه علمی باغ نظر، 17 (92)، صص 50ـ29.

صادقی، مسعود و عمادزاده، مصطفی .1382. برآورد سهم سرمایه انسانی در رشد اقتصادی ایران طی سالهای 80 ـ 1345. فصلنامه پژوهشهای اقتصادی ایران، شماره 17. صص 98 ـ 79.

طالشی، مصطفی، فرهاد عزیزپور و غلام دولتی .1398. تحلیل اثر جریانات فضایی در تحولات کالبدی ـ فضایی روستاهای پیراشهری (مورد: سکونتگاههای روستایی پیرامون کلانشهر کرج). مسکن و محیط روستا، شماره 166، صص 94ـ 79.

فالسلیمان، محمود؛ حوریه مرادی، محمد حجیپور و عاطفه احمدی.1393. واکاوی و تحلیل قابلیتهای اقتصادی ـ فضایی لازم برای رشد کارآفرینی در استان کرمانشاه. کنفرانس بینالمللی توسعه و تعالی کسب و کار، تهران، 26 آذر ماه 1393. ص 124.

فلاححقیقی، نگین .1396. هرم توسعه کارآفرینی روستایی بر اساس اصول سیاستهای توسعه روستایی اتحادیه اروپا. نشریه کارآفرینی در کشاورزی، جلد چهارم، شماره اول، صص 131ـ 115.

کاظمیترقبان، مریم؛ مبارکی، محمدحسن .1391. بررسی اثر کارآفرینی بر رشد اقتصادی ایران با استفاده از رویکرد میانگینگیری بیزی. فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی، دوره پنجم، شماره سوم. صص 144 ـ 125.

مرادی، حوریه، جوان، فرهاد، امرایی، سپیده، بیرانوندراد، مریم.1399. اثرات کارآفرینی روستایی در توسعه فضا‌های پیراشهری شهرستان کرمانشاه، دوره 9، شماره 34، صص 82-63.

مرادی، حوریه.1395. طراحی الگوی مناسب کارآفرینی در توسعه نواحی روستایی شهرستان کرمانشاه، رساله دکتری، گروه جغرافیای انسانی، جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران.

مرکز آمار ایران .1395. سرشماری نفوس و مسکن استان کرمانشاه.

هاشمی، سیدسعید .1390. تبیین نقش نهادهای محلی در توسعه کارآفرینی روستایی. رساله دکتری گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی روستایی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران. 249 ص.

Angel, S., Sheppard, S. C. & Civco, D. L. 2015. The Dynamics of Global Urban Expansion. Washington, DC: World Bank, Transport, Urban Development Department

Allen. J.C & etal .2003. Examination of Community Action Field Theory Model for Locality Based Entrepreneurship; Presented at the Annual Rural Sociological SocietyMeeting, Montreal, Canada.

Audretsch, D., and Keilbach, M. 2004. Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance.” Regional Studies, 38(8), 949 - 959.

Bashir, S. 2013. A SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN NORTHEAST REGIONOF THE UNITED STATES. Dissertation Submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design at West Virginia University. P, 121.

Chambers, Edward J. and Shaw, Stuart E. 2004. a Primer on western Canadian Entrepreneurship; The Western Centre for Economic Research gratefully acknowledges the support of Western Economic Diversification Canada; NUMBER: 76.

Claire Aure, J. 2013. Traditional Entrepreneur Networks and Regional Resilience. A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy. ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY. P, 204.

GTZ (GmbH Technische Zusammenarbiet) .2003. Guide to Rural Economic and Enterprise Development, Working Paper, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur.

Julian, S.D. et al .2000. «SWOT, SWot, or swOT? An Exploration of the Relative Effect of the Internal and External Environments on Organizational Responses to a Strategic Issue».

Kuratko, D., Hajets .2004. The emergence of entreprenship education: development, trends and challenges. Entreprenship: Theory and Practice.

Iyigun, M. F; and Owen, A. L. 1999. Entrepreneurs, Professionals, and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol 4, Pp: 213-232.

Markley, Deborah M. 2002. Entrepreneurship in Rural America; Prepared for the NCSL Rural Development Task Force; Center for Rural Entrepreneurship.

Markley. D. M.2005. local Strategies for Responding to Rural Restructuring: The Role of Entrepreneurship; Globalization and Restructuring in Rural America Conference ERS-USDA June 6, 2005 Washington. D.C.

Muller, S. 2013. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: ON THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN AGENCY AND CONTEXT. A PhD thesis submitted to Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University. P, 220.

Reagan B. 2002. Are high-growth entrepreneurs building the rural economy? Center for the Study of Rural America. Kansas City, Mo.: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

Rocha, H; & Sternberg, R. 2005. Entrepreneurship: The Role of Clusters Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence from Germany. Small Business Economics (2005) 24: 267–292.

Saure, R. J. 1986. Agriculture and the Rural Community: Opportunities and Challenges for Rural Development, Interdependenecies of Agricultural and Rural Communities in the Twenty first Century: The North Central Region, P. F. Iowa State University, Ames, IA, pp. 1-11.

Shane, S. 2001. Technology Regimes and New Firm Formation. Management Science, 47(9), Pp: 1173-1190.

Ulrich, Seibert.2005. BB-Gesetzgebungsreport: Das Gesetz zur Unternehmensintegritat und Modernisierung des Anfechtungsrechts (UMAG) kommt um.

Verheul. I & et al .2001. An Eclectic Theory of Entrepreneurship; Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper Institute for Development Strategies; Indiana University.

Wennekers, Sander, Thurik, Roy.1999. “Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth”. Small Business Economics, no 13,27-55.