Assessing the development of local communities in suburban areas with emphasis on the role of participatory management (Case: Safadasht)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Architecture and Urban planning, Technical and Vocational University(TVU),Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Surveying, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran  

3 Master of Geography and Urban Planning, Payam Noor University, Gilan Province, Rasht, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Over the past 50 years, development paradigms have increasingly favored local and indigenous planning over other forms. As a result, the practice and theory of planning have grown to include more studies of how local communities can be involved in the planning process. This has led to the emergence of decentralized planning and quantitative and bottom-up approaches to planning.
Local involvement in decision-making is crucial for strengthening the role of individuals, associations, and institutions. Citizens should be encouraged to participate in activities that develop programs tailored to their community's needs and circumstances. This approach, known as participatory management, fosters collaboration between institutions and departments, facilitating the exchange of information and knowledge. Working together, we can promote economic, social, physical, and environmental growth in urban and suburban communities. It is important to consider the negative effects of uncontrolled expansion, as exemplified by the situation in Tehran. If land trading is not managed correctly and planned, it can result in environmental degradation and greatly impact suburban areas like Safadasht. Having foresight and a well-structured plan is imperative for achieving sustainable progress. Participatory management is crucial to improve the quality of suburbs like Safadasht in Tehran and address social, economic, physical, and environmental challenges. If suburban areas are not managed properly, the city cannot function as an intelligent, vibrant, and knowledgeable system. Additionally, citizens will be unable to produce and reproduce economic and social products. Therefore, urban management of suburban areas like Safadasht must prioritize participatory management.
 
Methodology
This study serves a clear purpose and has applied and theoretical applications. It is descriptive and analytical quantitative research. We used integrated models such as fuzzy Savara and fuzzy Cooper along with SPSS software to analyze the data. The statistical population in the present study consists of two parts. Based on the census conducted in 2016, the urban area of Safadasht is home to 32476 people. Using Cochran's method and random sampling, a sample population of 379 households was selected for the first part of the study. The second part of the study involved experts in the field, with a sample community of 20 experts selected, as is typical for most fuzzy models.
 
Results and discussion
The results showed that the situation of participatory management in the suburban area of Safadasht is unfavorable. It was found that the development of local communities is hindered. The Spearman correlation test showed a significant and positive relationship between the two variables. An integrated model, which utilizes both fuzzy SORA and fuzzy COPRAS, was employed to evaluate the impact of different components on economic, social, and environmental dimensions. According to the findings, the social aspect of the study received a score of 72.34, which indicates a satisfactory level of quality. Among the suggested factors, participative management had the most influence on participation and local control, while respect for human rights had the least impact.
Additionally, in the economic aspect, the overall score (72.48) is within the acceptable range of quality. Furthermore, among the proposed factors, justice and economic welfare had the highest impact on participative management, with a score of 73.11. The environmental dimension has a total score of 71.345, indicating a good quality level. Among the suggested components, the one with the highest score of 72.44 is dedicated to strengthening environmental awareness and is the most influential in participatory management. Overall, the environmental condition is in a green state.
 
Conclusion
When it comes to local community development and the role of individuals in that process, it is clear that modern suburban societies require a management approach that emphasizes human development and aims to achieve satisfaction among people ultimately. This type of management is known as participatory or innovative management.

Keywords

Main Subjects


آذربایجانی، کریم و جواد، دریایی. 1386. بررسی تأثیر عملکرد شورا­های شهر بر اثربخشی شهرداری­ها (مطالعه موردی: شورای اسلامی شهر و شهرداری آباد). پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی و اجتماعی. دوره 7. شماره 25. صص 13-28.
اسکندری ثانی، محمد و ژیلا، سجادی. 1393. کنش­جمعی، توسعه اجتماعات محلی و نقش آن‌ها در کاهش فقر شهری مورد­شناسی: نعمت­آباد تهران. جغرافیا و آمایش شهری-منطقه­ای. دوره 4. شماره 11. صص 31-48/
حیدری ساربان، وکیل. 1396. سنجش و رتبه­بندی سطح توسعه­یافتگی اجتماعی مناطق روستایی شهرستان مشکین­شهر. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا. سال 7. شماره 23.
رجبی، آزیتا و  حصاری­نژاد، جعفر. 1392. شرکت­های مردم‌نهاد شهری؛ راهکاری برای مشارکت شهروندان در مدیریت شهری. فصلنامه اقتصاد و مدیریت شهری، شماره 4. صص 111-129.
رحمانی، امیر و رحمانی، محمد. 1395. ارزیابی عوامل ساختاری-نهادی مؤثر بر مشارکت روستاییان در فرایند اجرای طرح­های هادی روستایی (نمونه موردی: روستا­های واقع در حریم کلانشهر همدان). فصلنامه جغرافیایی سرزمین، سال 13 شماره 52.
رکن­الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا و سجاسی­قیداری، حمدالله. عینالی، جمشید. 1386. نگرشی نو به مدیریت روستایی با تأکید برنهادهای تأثیرگذار. فصلنامه روستا و توسعه، سال 10. شماره 2.
زارع، الهام و فرامرزی اصل، مهسا. عباسی پارام، الناز. 1399. بررسی نقش مشارکت اجتماعات محلی در توسعه پایدار اجتماعی شهرها (مطالعه موردی: محله سنگلچ تهران). معماری شهر پایدار. سال 6. شماره اول. صص 101-116.
سواری، مسلم و  اسکندری دامنه، حامد. 1398. نقش مدیریت مشارکتی در توانمندسازی جوامع محلی در مقابله با خشکسالی در جنوب استان کرمان. برنامه­ریزی و آمایش فضا. دوره 23. شماره 2.
عوض­پور، لیلا و  قربانی، مهدی. عرفان­زاده، رضا. 1396. تحلیل موقعیت کنشگران و سرمایه اجتماعی ذی‌نفعان در راستای مدیریت مشارکتی سیستم­های اجتماعی-اکولوژیک (مطالعه موردی روستا حق­الخواجه، شهرستان میامی، استان سمنان). مرتع و آبخیزداری (منابع طبیعی ایران). د70. شماره 2. صص 448-435.
قربانی، مهدی و موسوی، هما. اسماعیلی، بهناز. 1387. تحلیل سرمایه اجتماعی در راستای مدیریت مشارکتی مناطق خشک. تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران، ج 25. شماره 2. صص 387-378.
فرشاد، لقمان و ساریخانی، عادل. بهادری، بهناز. 1399. نقش جشنواره انار در توسعه پایدار گردشگری جوامع محلی در نواحی مرزی موردمطالعه: (روستاهای منطقه اورامانات شهرستان پاوه). جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، دوره 3. شماره 1.
فرید، یدالله. 1375. جغرافیا و شهرشناسی. چاپ چهارم. تبریز: انتشارات دانشگاه تبریز.
کریم­زاده جعفری، الهام و  ملک­نیا، رحیم. 1399. نگرشی بر رویکرد مدیریت مشارکتی جوامع محلی ذینفع جنگل. همایش علمی پژوهشی توسعه و ترویج علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ایران.
کاظمیان، غلامرضا و ضیایی، محمود. امیری، مقصود. مرادی، حسین. 1397. ارائه الگویی برای مدیریت مناطق پیراشهری کلان‌شهر تهران (موردمطالعه: منطقه 22). جغرافیا (برنامه­ریزی منطقه­ای)، سال هشتم. شماره 2. صص 361-378.
مشکینی، ابوالفضل و پورموسوی، سید موسی. موذن، سهراب. 1393. ارزیابی الگوی مدیریت محله مبتنی بر شاخص­های حکمروایی مطلوب شهری مطالعه موردی: محله اوین تهران. فصلنامه مطالعات شهری. شماره 6. صص 31-42.
یوسفی، رضا و آقازاده، سمیرا. اکبری، ناصر. تقی­زاده، بهرام. 1394. بررسی نقش مدیریت مشارکتی در بهبود فرایند مدیریت انسانی. کنفرانس­های بین­المللی پژوهش­های نوین مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری، استانبول. موسسه­ی مدیران ایده پرداز پایتخت ایلیا.
Adell, G.2003. theries and models of the pre – urban interface: A changing conceptual landscape, strategic environmental planning and management for the peri – urban in terface research project. perelompment planning unit (DPU) university college London.
Bado, V. B. and Bationo, A. 2018.  Chapter One - Integrated Management of Soil Fertility and Land Resources in Sub-Saharan Africa: Involving Local Communities. Advances in Agronomy, Volume 150, 2018, PP. 1-33.
Flora, C.B.,Flora, J.L. 1993. “Entrepreneurial Social Infrastructure: A Necessary. Ingredient.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 539: 48-58.P.11.
Friedmann, J., 2008, the Uses of Planning Theory: A Bibliographic Essay Journal of Planning Education and Research, No. 28, PP. 247-257.
Hollmann, R. Merchant, CJ. Saunders, R. Downy, C. Buchwitz, M. Cazenave, A. Chuvieco, E. Defourny, P. de Leeuw, G. Forsberg, R. and Holzer-Popp, T. 2013. The ESA climate change initiative: Satellite data records for essential climate variables. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 94(10), 1541-1552.
Shehu Hussain, M. 2014. The Role of Cooperative Organizations in Rural Community Development in Nigeria Prospects and Challenge. Academic Research International, 5(3):PP. 189-197.
Gilchrist, A. 2004. The well-connected community: a networking approach to community development: Community Development Foundation (Great Britain), The Policy Press, UK.P. 9.
Myer, V.2011.  The Ecological Footprint, The ecological footprint as an environmental education tool for knowledge. Attitude and behaviour changes towards sustainable living: a case study, Master thesis submitted to the University of South Africa, http://uir.unisa. ac.za/handle/10500/2248. Pdf, (accessed: February 21, 2011).
Onyx, J. & Bullen, P.2005.  Measuring social capital in five communities, l capital and its influencing factors among rural residents (case study, Uramanat area Kermanshah Province). Journal of Rural Planning, 2(4): no51, 52.
Onyx, J., Bullen, P. 2000. “Sources of social capital”. In I. winter (Ed), social capital and public policy in Australia (pp. 105 – 134). Melbourne: Australian Institute of family studie
Williams, C. C. 2004. Community Capacity Building: A Critical Evaluation of the Third Sector Approach. Review of Policy Research, 21(5), 729-733.