An analysis of the state of good governance in Urban Peripheral villages of Urmia

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor in Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

3 M.A in Urban planning, Young Researchers and Elite Club, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

4 M.Sc. in Urban Planning and Regeneration, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction

Today, urban peripheral spaces are expanding due to the lack of control and supervision over the development of urban spaces, so Urban Peripheral villages of Urmia was also created for the growth and development of the city and now it provides services to its residents as an urban peripheral. A number of these settlements, due to their proximity to the informal and marginalized settlements, They have experienced many negative physical and social changes due to the unprincipled and unplanned growth of these informal settlements and their proximity to this context, It has caused bad living conditions and reduced quality of life, which requires special attention to reduce the consequences of this development. Therefore, the main goal of this research is to analyze the situation of good governance in the Urban Peripheral villages of Urmia, To evaluate the current situation of these villages in order to improve their situation from the point of view of good governance. Among the fields of research innovation, in the field of research method, we can mention the use of new decision-making methods and the use of new data. Also, due to the lack of similar research, it seems necessary to conduct this research in order to prevent the unprincipled expansion of this settlement and the reduction of their quality of life and livability.

Methodology

The current research method is longitudinal in terms of time and practical in terms of results, also the process of conducting the research is quantitative and descriptive-analytical in terms of its purpose. The method of collecting information is in two forms, documentary, and field. The tool for collecting information is also in the form of questionnaires and field observations. The statistical population of the study is the residents of the Urban Peripheral villages of Urmia, which includes the villages of Band, Topraq Qala, Dadeh Saqi, Reihanabad, Vazirabad, Velandeh-e Sofla, Anhar-e Sofla, Ganjabad and Mirabad, which according to the statistics of Iran Statistics Center in 2015, the population of Pirasheri villages is 21,059 people. In order to determine the sample size, Cochran's formula was used with an error percentage of 0.05, and a value of 377 was obtained, which was randomly distributed in the study area. in order to evaluate the state of good governance in the Urban Peripheral villages of Urmia, 6 components have been used, which include rural participation, accountability and transparent, responsive, justice and equality, efficiency and effectiveness, and supervision, and the data has been analyzed quantitatively and by SPSS software. in order to analyze the data of the research, due to the fact that the size of the statistical population is more than 20 and also because of the central limit theorem, their normality is not checked, therefore, statistical methods such as one-sample t-test and Spearman's correlation have been used to analyze the data. DEMATEL's multi-criteria decision-making method has been used to find the relationship between the research components and finally, the VIKOR model has been used to rank the studied villages. The validity of the questionnaires has been confirmed by experts in this field and the reliability of the questionnaires has been confirmed by Cronbach's alpha test.

Results and discussion

The findings of this research indicate that according to the one-sample t-test, In terms of having good governance in the Urban Peripheral villages of Urmia, the villages of Band and Topraq Qala have a better situation than the average level. The villages of Vazirabad, Anhar-e Sofla and Mirabad are at a medium level. The villages of Dadeh Saqi, Reihanabad, Velandeh-e Sofla and Ganjabad are at a lower-than-average level. According to the results of Spearman's correlation test, there is a relationship between the components of good governance and good governance, and according to Spearman's correlation coefficients, these relationships are direct. Also, justice and equality have the highest correlation with good governance in the study area, which is an improvement. The state of justice and equality, and the state of good governance will also improve. According to the results of DEMATEL's decision-making model, the component of justice and equality with the value (D) of 5.919 is the most effective, the component of responsibility with the value of (R) of 5.598 is the most Influence, and finally, the component of supervision with the value of (D+R) is 10.485. It is most related to other components. Also, the three components of rural participation, justice and equality, and supervision as the “cause” and the three components of accountability and transparency, efficiency and effectiveness, and responsibility as "disability". the conceptual model of the research shows that the component of justice and equality is related to all the components and the component Responsibility is also communicable from all components. According to the results of VIKOR model, the Urban Peripheral villages of Urmia, Band, Topraq Qala, Anhar-e Sofla, Vazirabad, Mirabad, Velandeh-e Sofla, Dadeh Saqi, Reihanabad and finally Ganjabad are ranked first to ninth respectively.

Conclusion

Today, due to the unprincipled and unplanned expansion of cities, it has caused the proximity of cities to the villages around them, and in the meantime, it has caused the formation of Spaces called Urban Peripheral, which sometimes, due to the proximity to informal settlements, have caused the reproduction and expansion of marginalization around the cities. Is. In this regard, in order to prevent the reproduction of informal settlements and marginalization in these contexts, urban and rural managers should formulate and adopt principled macro and micro policies based on the components of good governance. Also, according to the results of the research, the use of the component of justice and equality in line with the development of principles Cities are of great importance, and along with that, it can provide effective results in this area with bottom-up planning and attracting the participation of residents.

Keywords

Main Subjects


افراخته، حسن. 1399. فضاهای پیراشهری: الگوها، عوامل و پسایندها. مجله توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، دوره 2، شماره 1، صص 1-18.
پازکی، معصومه؛ شیخی، داود و صمدی‌‌‌‌مقدّم، شیرین. 1399. تحلیل نقشِ مدیریت مبتنی بر حکمروایی خوب در توسعۀ پایدار روستایی مطالعۀ موردی: دهستان فیلستان، شهرستان پاکدشت. نشریه جغرافیا و توسعه، دوره 18، شماره 58، صص 93-112. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2020.5178
حجاریان، احمد. 1401. مسئولیت‌پذیری حکمروایی خوب بر پایداری اجتماعی خانوارهای روستایی (مطالعه موردی: مناطق روستایی شهرستان کاشان). جغرافیا و پایداری محیط، دوره 12، شماره 1، صص 41-55. doi: 10.22126/ges.2022.7385.2490
حکمت نیا، حسن؛ ملکی، محمد؛ موسوی، میرنجف و افشانی، علیرضا. 1396. بررسی و تحلیل حکمروایی خوب شهری در ایران :موردمطالعه : شهر ایلام. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، دوره 7، شماره 24، صص 143-152.
حیدری ساربان، وکیل. 1398. ارزیابی الگوی مدیریت محلی روستایی مبتنی‌بر شاخص‌‌های حکمروایی خوب مطالعۀ موردی: شهرستان مشگین‌شهر. نشریه جغرافیا و توسعه، دوره 17، شماره 57، صص 133-154. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2019.4985
خداپناه، کیومرث. 1400. ارزیابی اثرات حکمروایی شایسته بر زیست‌پذیری روستاها موردمطالعه: بخش مرکزی شهرستان اردبیل. فصلنامه علمی برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، دوره 11، شماره 41، صص 83-100. doi: 10.30495/jzpm.2021.3731
خوش­فر، غلامرضا؛ شایان، محسن و خداداد، مهدی. 1398. تحلیلی بر عملکرد مدیریت روستایی با تأکید برشاخص­های حکمروایی خوب مورد: روستاهای شهرستان زرین‌دشت. مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی -فرهنگی. دوره 7، شماره 4، صص ۹-۳۵.
فال سلیمان، محمود. شاطری، مفید و خسروی نرگس.1399.بررسی مقایسه‌ی شاخص‌های حکمروایی مطلوب روستایی (موردمطالعه: شهرستان بیرجند). مطالعات فرهنگی اجتماعی خراسان، دوره 15، شماره 1، صص 95-118. doi: 10.22034/fakh.2021.236978.1409
مطیعی­لنگرودی، سید حسن. حجی­پور، محمد. 1397. الگوی میان کنش کارکرد سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد با حکمروایی مطلوب روستایی نمونه: دشت حسین‌آباد غیناب در شهرستان سربیشه. جغرافیا و توسعه، دوره 16، شماره 50،صص 109- 126.
مؤمنی، احمد؛ جهانشیری، ماندانا و عزمی، آئیژ. 1399. اثرات حکمروایی خوب بر زیست‌پذیری سکونتگاه‌های پیراشهری در دهستان آدران. مجله توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، دوره 2، شماره 1،صص 193-205.
Azadi, H. 2020. Monitoring land governance: Understanding roots and shoots. Land Use Policy, 94, Article 104530.
Brand, U., Muraca, B., Pineault, E., Sahakian, M., Schaffartzik, A., Novy, A., Streissler, C., Haberl, H., Asara, V., Dietz, K., Lang, M., Kothari, A., Smith, T., Spash, C., Brad, A., Pichler, M., Plank, C.,  Velegrakis, G., Jahn, T., Carter, A., Huan, Q., Kallis, G., Martínez Alier, J., Riva, G., Satgar, V., Teran Mantovani, E., Williams, M., Wissen, M. & Görg, G. 2021. From planetary to societal boundaries: an argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17:1, 264-291, https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754
Eakin, H., Rueda, X., & Mahanti, A. 2017. Transforming governance in telecoupled food systems. Ecology and Society, 22. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09831-220432
Gunderson, L., Cosens, B. A., Chaffin, B. C., Arnold, C. A. (Tom), Fremier, A. K., Garmestani, A. S., Craig, R. K., Gosnell, H., Birge, H. E., Allen, C. R., Benson, M. H., Morrison, R. R., Stone, M. C., Hamm, J. A., Nemec, K., Schlager, E., & Llewellyn, D. 2017. Regime shifts and panarchies in regional scale social-ecological water systems. Ecology and Society, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08879-220131
Hu, A. 2014. Can education make us healthier? An urban-rural comparative analysis based on the 2010 Chinese general social survey. Social Sciences in China, 5, 116-130.
Huang, Z. 2008. Simple governance of centralization: Semi formal grassroots administration with quasi officials and dispute resolution as the main task. Open Era, 02 (2008): 10-29.
Jørgensen, P. S., Folke, C., & Carroll, S. P. 2019. Evolution in the Anthropocene: Informing Governance and policy. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 50, 527–546.
Karna, S. (2022). Rural-Urban Linkage and Role of Civil Society: A Successful Model for Good Urban Governance in Nepal, Researchgate.
Löfmarck, E., & Lidskog, R. 2017. Bumping against the boundary: IPBES and the knowledge divide. Environmental Science & Policy, 69, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.008
Morandín-Ahuerma, I., Contreras-Hernández, A., Ayala-Ortiz, D. A., & Pérez-Maqueo, O. 2019. Socio–Ecosystemic Sustainability. Sustainability, 11(12), 3354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123354
Palmer, C. G., Fry, A., Libala, N., Ralekhetla, M., Mtati, N., Weaver, M., Mtintsilana, Z., & Scherman, P.-A. 2022. Engaging society and building participatory governance in a rural landscape restoration context. Anthropocene, 37, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100320
Reid, A., & Nikel, J. 2008. Differentiating and evaluating conceptions and examples of participation in environment-related learning. Springer Netherlands, 32-60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6416-6_3
Sarker, M.N.I., Hossin, A., Min, W., Aktaruzzaman, M. 2018. Poverty Alleviation of Rural People through Good Governance in Bangladesh. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 4(12), 547-555.
Schoon, M., Chapman, M., Loos, J., Ifejika Speranza, C., Carr Kelman, C., Aburto, J., ... & Whittaker, D. 2021. On the frontiers of collaboration and conflict: how context influences the success of collaboration. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1946593
Sun, P., Zhou, L., Ge, D., Lu, X., Sun, D., Lu, M., & Qiao, W. 2021. How does spatial governance drive rural development in China’s farming areas?. Habitat International, 109, 102320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102320
Wang, D. 2019. Reduction but not elimination: health inequalities among urban, migrant, and rural children in China—the moderating effect of the fathers’ education level. BMC Public Health, 19, 1-12.
‌Wang, Y., Li, Y., Huang, Y., Yi, C., & Ren, J. 2020. Housing wealth inequality in China: An urban-rural comparison. Cities, 96, 102428.
Wong, H. L., Wang, Y., Luo, R., Zhang, L., & Rozelle, S. 2017. Local governance and the quality of local infrastructure: Evidence from village road projects in rural China. Journal of Public Economics, 152, 119-132.
World bank .1992. Governance and Development Report, Washington.
Wu, Y., Sun, X., Sun, L., & Choguill, C. L. 2020. Optimizing the governance model of urban villages based on integration of inclusiveness and urban service boundary (USB): A Chinese Case Study. Cities, 96, 102427.
Ye, C., & Liu, Z. 2020. Rural-urban co-governance: Multi-scale practice. Science Bulletin, 65, 778–780.
Zhang, L., Zeng, Y., Wang, L., & Fang, Y. 2020. Urban–Rural differences in long-term care service status and needs among home-based elderly people in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1701.
Zhang, Q., Ye, C., & Duan, J. 2022. Multi-dimensional superposition: Rural collaborative governance in Liushe Village, Suzhou City. Journal of Rural Studies, 96, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.002