Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Identifying Key Factors Affecting the Decline of Seismic Resilience in Urban Peripheral Areas with an Emphasis on Urban Growth and Development Dimensions (Case Study: Bojnord)

Document Type : Articles extracted from Thesis

Authors
Sadegh Khani Koushki 1
Ramezan Ali Naderi Mayvan 2
Farzad Ghaderi Bafti 3
1 Ph.D Student, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Shir.C., Islamic Azad University, Shirvan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Kosar University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Construction Management, Shir.C., Islamic Azad University, Shirvan, Iran.
10.22034/jpusd.2025.541625.1364
Abstract
Introduction
The urban peripheral areas of Bojnord face increasing challenges in seismic resilience due to urban growth and development. This study provides a comprehensive examination of the factors influencing this resilience, with a focus on various dimensions of urban expansion. The primary objective is to develop a deeper understanding of existing complexities and identify pathways for improving conditions in these areas. Bojnord, the capital of North Khorasan Province, has experienced significant urban development in recent years. However, this rapid and often unplanned expansion marked by scattered construction that disregards engineering safety standards has increased the seismic vulnerability of areas near active faults. The city’s aging infrastructure, largely composed of traditional, non-reinforced materials that fail to meet modern seismic codes, is particularly at risk, especially in fault-adjacent zones where earthquakes could cause severe human and economic losses. Compounding the problem, uncontrolled urban sprawl and illegal construction on the city’s outskirts have left entire neighborhoods without resilient infrastructure or safety-compliant buildings, amplifying potential disaster impacts. Another critical issue is the lack of open spaces and safe gathering points, which are vital for emergency shelter and protection during crises a shortfall with potentially catastrophic consequences in high-risk areas. Further concerns arise from vulnerable critical infrastructure (e.g., power grids, water systems, and telecommunications), which lack adequate reinforcement and could fail post-disaster. Public awareness and training on earthquake preparedness are also insufficient, with the absence of systematic educational programs exacerbating the city’s fragility. Addressing these challenges requires smart urban planning, seismic retrofitting of buildings, infrastructure upgrades, and community training. Key solutions include renovating dilapidated structures, enforcing construction standards for new builds (particularly near fault lines), and strategically developing open spaces and emergency hubs to mitigate risks. Ultimately, Bojnord’s urban growth must align with comprehensive resilience strategies to safeguard its residents. This study seeks to identify the key factors undermining seismic resilience in Bojnord’s Peripheral Areas, emphasizing urban development dimensions. The findings could inform policymaking, infrastructure improvements, and public awareness campaigns paving the way for a safer, more disaster-resistant city.

Methodology
This research is an applied qualitative study conducted through a descriptive-analytical survey approach. Data was collected via documentary and library research, as well as field interviews with 35 managers and experts in Bojnord County (using purposive sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved). Data analysis was performed using grounded theory (Strauss and Corbin’s approach), involving open, axial, and selective coding stages. The 60 to 90-minute interviews were recorded, transcribed, and categorized using a paradigmatic model (causal, contextual, and intervening factors) to derive a data-driven theory.

Results and discussion
The results revealed that the decline in seismic resilience in Bojnord suburbs is influenced by three key factors: causal factors (such as migration, fear of property devaluation, and local tensions), contextual factors (including non-resistant traditional architecture, active faults, and lack of infrastructure investment), and intervening factors (such as managerial and executive weaknesses, as well as shortcomings in crisis management). These factors interact simultaneously in a networked manner, collectively undermining the seismic stability of these areas. Therefore, enhancing Bojnord seismic resilience requires comprehensive and coordinated planning across social, cultural, economic, managerial, and infrastructural dimensions.

Conclusion
This study comprehensively and meticulously uncovers the root causes behind the decline in seismic resilience in Bojnord urban peripheral areas. The results clearly demonstrate that this complex issue stems from deep-seated social, psychological, managerial, economic, and even cultural factors transcending any single dimension.
Causal factors reveal that the problems originate from within Bojnord societal fabric. Rural-urban migration has fragmented the social structure and deepened generational divides. Psychological barriers, such as the normalization of earthquake risks and fears of property devaluation, deter residents from retrofitting buildings. Declining public participation and the absence of active civil organizations have eroded social capital, nearly eliminating community oversight. Even local political tensions over budget allocations exacerbate the situation. Together, these elements have created a perilous foundation for seismic vulnerability.
Contextual factors highlight historical and geographical predispositions to this fragility. Traditional architecture and a fatalistic attitude toward natural disasters, combined with Bojnord location in a border region atop active faults, double the threat. Inadequate investment in resilient infrastructure and reliance on limited industries further undermine material and economic resilience. Cultural and psychological issues like risk denial and the spread of misinformation fuel public apathy and unpreparedness.
Intervening factors expose systemic failures: even with problem awareness, managerial weaknesses, bureaucratic hurdles, and political challenges obstruct effective solutions. Institutional fragmentation, lax oversight, inefficient crisis management, and a shortage of skilled personnel pose critical barriers to progress. Elite turnover and misguided political priorities further derail long-term resilience programs.
This multilayered crisis demands integrated action bridging social cohesion, infrastructure modernization, policy reform, and public education to transform Bojnord into a seismically resilient city. Only by addressing these intertwined dimensions can meaningful, sustainable progress be achieved.

Funding
According to the responsible author, this article has no financial support

Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.

Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
Keywords
Reduced resilience
Urban Peripheral Areas
urban growth and development
Bojnord.
Subjects
ابدالی، یعقوب، رمضانی حاجی محله، عارفه، معینی نسب، محسن. (1402). تحلیل راهبردی تاب‌آوری پیراشهری در برابر مخاطرات محیطی(موردمطالعه: نواحی پیراشهری سنندج). توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، 5(2)، 181-202. doi: 10.22034/jpusd.2023.366233.1237
پوراحمد، احمد، فرهادی، ابراهیم، سجودی، مریم، قربانی، رامین، عبدالله حسین، شاخوان. (1399). فرا تحلیلی بر پژوهش‌های تاب‌آوری شهری در نشریات علمی پژوهشی جغرافیایی ایران. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای اقتصادی، 1(2)، 1-19. 20.1001.1.27173747.1399.1.2.1.2
پورموسوی، سیدموسی، اقبال، محمدرضا، خوشخوان، جلال. (1394). بررسی میزان تحقق‌پذیری شاخص‌های مدیریت بحران در طرح تفصیلی موردمطالعه: منطقه 20 شهرداری تهران. تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی، 2(2)، 17-31. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/362422/
جلالیان، حمید، دادگر، حسین. (1394). پهنه‌بندی آسیب‌پذیری سکونتگاه‌های روستایی در برابر زلزله با مدل AHP، مطالعۀ موردی بخش چورزق شهرستان طارم. جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی محیطی، 26(3)، 42-29. https://gep.ui.ac.ir/article_18748.html
جلالیان، سید اسحاق. (1397). ارزیابی تاب‌آوری ساختاری ـ طبیعی کاربری اراضی شهری (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 4 کلان‌شهر تهران)، فصلنامه شهـر پایـدار، 1(4)، 123 ـ 109. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2019.91679
حاتمی­نژاد، حسین، کهکی، فاطمه سادات، صادقی، فرشید (1401). سنجش تاب‌آوری کالبدی سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی در برابر مخاطرات محیطی (زلزله)، مطالعه موردی: پاکدشت(شهرک انقلاب). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای اقتصادی، 3(9)، 22-38. https://jurs.znu.ac.ir/article_700017.html
صادقی، حجت و جوان، فرهاد. (1403). ارزیابی روستاهای گردشگری ایران از لحاظ آسیب‌پذیری ژئوفیزیکی با استفاده از سناریوهای فازی. پژوهش های روستائی، 15(4)، 85-100. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.383580.1993
طحانی سهی، سارا، حناچی، سیمین. (1400). نقش مدیریت شهری در ایجاد و ارتقای تاب‌آوری اجتماعی جهت کاهش نرخ مهاجرت از ایران، ششمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی تحقیقات بین­رشته­ای در عمران، معماری و مدیریت شهری قرن ۲۱، تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/1298960
کرمی، فریبا، بیاتی خطیبی، مریم، رستمی همای علیا، نرگس. (1401). بررسی تاب‌آوری نواحی روستایی پیراشهری در برابر سیلاب (مطالعه موردی: برخی روستاهای دهستان میدان چای). جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، 26(80)، 251-271. doi: 10.22034/gp.2021.46066.2840
کریمی قطب­آبادی، فضل­اله، زنگی­آبادی، علی. (1402). سنجش تاب‌آوری اقتصادی سکونتگاه‌های شهری جدید در برابر خطر زلزله با استفاده از Edas Method (مطالعه موردی: منطقه شهری اصفهان). تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی،۱۰ (۴)، 41-58. 10.22034/gp.2022.49842.2955
محققی، پریسا، قدمی، مصطفی، عظیمی آملی، جلال، جانباز قبادی، غلامرضا. (1400). بررسی تاب‌آوری در برابر زلزله با تأکید بر فرم شهری(مطالعه موردی: منطقه‌ی دوازده شهر تهران). مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 8(29)، 245-273. https://shahr.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3445.html
نظم فر، حسین، زنگانه، احمد، مه­آبادی پور، محمد­مهدی. (1403). ارزیابی و رتبه­بندی تاب‌آوری شهری در مناطق پیراکلانشهر. (e214836). توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری. e214836 doi: 10.22034/jpusd.2025.493945.1327
نیک‌پور، عامر، لطفی، صدیقه، یاراحمدی، منصوره. (1400). ارزیابی میزان تاب‌آوری شهر نورآباد ممسنی در برابر سوانح طبیعی (زلزله). مدیریت بحران، 10(19)، 71-57. https://www.joem.ir/article_243253.html?lang=fa
وزارت راه و شهرسازی ایران. (۱۴۰۰). طرح جامع کاهش خطرپذیری زلزله در کلانشهرها. گزارش داخلی.
Ahern, J.F. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc Urban Plan, 100, 341–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
Aksha, S. K., & Emrich, Ch. T. (2020). Benchmarking Community Disaster Resilience in Nepal. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061985
Asian Institute of Technology. (2025). 4th International Symposium on Disaster Resilience and Sustainable Development (DRSD 2025). Retrieved from https://ait.ac.th/event/4th-international-symposium-on-disaster-resilience-and-sustainable-development-drsd-2025/
Cavallaro, M., Asprone, D., Latora, V., Manfredi, G., & Nicosia, V. (2014). Assessment of urban ecosystem resilience through hybrid social-physical complex networks. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng, 29, 608–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12080
Das, S. (2019). Geospatial mapping of flood susceptibility and hydro-geomorphic response to the floods in Ulhas basin, India. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 14(3), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2019.02.006
Gralepois, M. (2020). What Can We Learn from Planning Instruments in Flood Prevention? Comparative Illustration to Highlight the Challenges of Governance in Europe. Water, 12(6), 18-41. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061841
Hawley, R.J., Bledsoe, B.P., Stein, E.D., & Haines, B.E. (2012). Channel Evolution Model of Semiarid Stream Response to Urban‐Induced Hydro modification, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48(4), 722-744. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00645.x
Hogan, D. M., Jarnagin, S.T., Loperfido, J.V., & Van Ness, K. (2014). Mitigating the effects of landscape development on streams in urbanizing watersheds, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 50(1), 163-178. C:\Users\loghman\Desktop\New folder\10.1111\jawr.12123
Jabareen, Y. (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities, 31, 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
Laskar, J. (2003). Frequency map analysis and particle accelerators, Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference IEEE, 1(3), 378-382. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1288929/
Liu, W., Zhou, J., Li, X., Zheng, H., & Liu, Y. (2024). Urban resilience assessment and its spatial correlation from the multidimensional perspective: A case study of four provinces in North-South Seismic Belt China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105109
Mavhura, E, Manyangadze, T, Raj Aryal, K. (2021). A composite inherent resilience index for Zimbabwe: An adaptation of the disaster resilience of place model, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102152.
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
Meng, M., Dabrowski, M., & Stead. D. (2020). Enhancing Flood Resilience and Climate Adaptation: The State of the Art and New Directions for Spatial Planning. Sustainability, 12(19), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197864
Sharifi, A., & Yamagata, Y. (2016). Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1654-1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
Soofi, S. Y. (2016). Achieving Urban Resilience: Through Urban Design and Planning Principles [Published Master’s thesis, Oxford Brookes University], Oxford, UK.
Sun, J, Zhai, N, Mu, H, Miao, J, Li, W, Li, M. (2023). Assessment of urban resilience and subsystem coupling coordination in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, Sustainable Cities and Society, Volume 100, January 2024, 105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105058
UN-Habitat. (2019). Tehran Urban Resilience Project. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://iran.un.org/en/download/12511/48343
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2025). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025. Retrieved from https://www.undrr.org/gar/gar2025
United Nations. (2018). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/en/desa/2018-revision-world-urbanization-prospects
World Bank. (2020). Enhancing Urban Resilience: From Crisis to Sustainable Development. World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/
Zhang, X., Tang, W., Huang, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Understanding the causes of vulnerabilities for enhancing social-physical resilience: lessons from the Wen chuan earthquake. Environmental Hazards, 17(4), 292 309. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2018.1491383
Preipheral Urban Spaces Development
Volume 8, Issue 2 - Serial Number 20
Summer
Spring 2026
Pages 95-124