Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Feasibility study of facilitation offices in in organizing of informal settlements(case study Ghaem and Aminabad neighborhoods in Gom)

Document Type : Articles extracted from Thesis

Authors
Fatemeh Talkhabi 1
Mohsen Shaterian 2
1 Ma M.Sc. Department of Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan Iran.
2 Prof. Department of Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan,Iran.
10.22034/jpusd.2025.539955.1363
Abstract
Introduction
In developing and less developed countries, unbalanced urbanization has led to numerous challenges in large cities, including unemployment, inflation, rising housing costs, traffic congestion, and the expansion of informal settlements. Rapid population growth, coupled with the absence of coherent socio-economic development plans and urban development strategies, has exacerbated internal migration and social inequality, resulting in the formation of peri-urban settlements. Migrants often, due to their inability to adapt to urban environments and economic pressures, gradually settle in marginalized areas, which differ significantly in terms of cultural and economic conditions from conventional urban neighborhoods. This phenomenon has created social, economic, and environmental challenges for urban planners, and previous policies, including neglect, forced eviction, or central planning, have largely failed to address these issues. In response to these challenges, the empowerment approach has emerged as an innovative strategy. Empowerment focuses on enhancing local community capacities and skills, promoting active citizen participation in planning, decision-making, and project implementation, while minimizing the direct role of formal planning institutions. Through this approach, residents of marginalized neighborhoods can identify their needs and actively participate in addressing them. However, two main challenges remain: first, the lack of managerial capacity and unfamiliarity with empowerment strategies; second, the lack of trust between residents and municipal authorities, which hampers effective participation. To address these challenges, Iran’s Social Affairs Organization established Facilitation and Local Development Offices in disadvantaged neighborhoods starting in 1976. These offices aim to improve quality of life, strengthen individual and collective capacities, and facilitate interaction between residents and authorities. They conduct neighborhood assessments, provide educational programs, and enable community empowerment. In Qom Province, two facilitation offices operate in Aminabad and Qaem neighborhoods. Their activities have included baseline studies, identification of trusted local representatives, and organization of educational workshops. The primary research question of this study is: "What role do facilitation offices play in empowering the Aminabad and Qaem neighborhoods, and to what extent have residents embraced their initiatives?"

Methodology
This research employed a descriptive-analytical approach with both library and survey methods. The theoretical framework and the questionnaire items were developed based on prior studies. The study population comprised residents of Qaem (27,000 individuals) and Aminabad (25,000 individuals) neighborhoods in Qom. Using random sampling, 200 participants were selected as the sample. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and the one-sample t-test to assess the effectiveness of facilitation office activities and residents’ satisfaction. The study applied a five-point Likert scale ranging from “very low” (1) to “very high” (5) to measure participants’ perceptions. This method allowed the researchers to prioritize various facilitation office activities and compare the performance of the offices across the two neighborhoods. Key indicators included residents’ familiarity with the offices, accessibility, participation in workshops, ability to address economic and social problems, trust-building, and overall impact on local development.

Results and discussion
Survey results from Qom indicated that residents were most satisfied with aspects such as office introduction, willingness to receive counseling, and the knowledge of office staff. The lowest satisfaction levels were associated with recreational spaces, improvements in the physical environment, and optimal use of incentives for increasing participation. The office’s successful performance in Qom is attributed to engaging trusted local representatives and presence in public and religious spaces. However, the COVID-19 pandemic and the presence of some foreign residents reduced trust among certain community members. The t-test showed that, for most variables, office performance exceeded the assumed mean, particularly regarding residents’ willingness to participate, indicating positive outcomes of the facilitation office in Qaem. In Aminabad, the highest satisfaction scores related to office introduction, ease of communication with staff, identification of trusted community members, awareness of workshop venues, and accessibility to office locations. Lowest satisfaction pertained to addressing environmental problems, economic and livelihood issues, and trust of young residents in the offices. The t-test revealed that, except for seven activity domains, the offices’ performance requires improvement. Comparing the two neighborhoods, indicators most strongly affecting office success included the ability to solve economic and livelihood problems, trust-building, and the presence and effectiveness of services. The least impactful factors were public access to meetings, suitability of office space, and use of modern remote communication methods. Overall, the Qom office’s performance was more tangible to residents, yet public satisfaction in both neighborhoods indicates that citizens’ expectations have not been fully met.

Conclusion
Informal settlements represent one of the most significant urban challenges in developing countries, necessitating comprehensive planning to provide basic and advanced services and to support socio-economic development. The empowerment approach, implemented through facilitation offices in Iran, offers an effective mechanism for improving disadvantaged neighborhoods. These offices identify local needs, coordinate with service providers, provide training, strengthen local institutions, promote home-based and small-scale businesses, and address social issues. The study demonstrated that the Qom office outperformed the Aminabad office in trust-building, identifying community leaders, and resolving economic challenges. Nevertheless, areas such as office space improvement, youth participation, and addressing environmental concerns require attention. The findings highlight that facilitation offices, by enhancing public trust, utilizing local capacities, and improving educational and advisory services, can have a substantial impact on sustainable neighborhood development. While these results align with prior studies, differences in participation rates between neighborhoods underscore the need to tailor empowerment strategies to the social and cultural characteristics of each community.

Funding
According to the responsible author, this article has no financial support

Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.

Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper
Keywords
Informal settelements
facilitation offices
empowerment
social participation
Subjects
ابراهیمی، مهدی، نوروزی، اصغر و بابادی، سمیه. 1401. ارزیابی اثربخشی عملکرد دفاتر تسهیل گری در فرآیند توسعه محلات غیررسمی(مطالعه موردی: محله ارزنان اصفهان). مجله مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران، 14(4)، صص324-307
افراخته، حسن. 1399. فضاهای پیراشهری: الگوها، عوامل و پسایندها. مجله توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، 2(1)، صص18-1
بذرگر، محمدرضا، رحیمی، محمد و سلطانی، علی.(1396). ظرفیت­سنجی مدیریت­شهری در فرایند توانمندسازی سکونتگاه­های غیررسمی(نمونه موردی: پنج شهر ایران). نشریه جغرافیا. 15(53)،صص 250-233.
بردبار گلوی، اعظم و قنبری، سیروس. (1402)، نقش تسهیلگری فرآیندهای اجتماع‌محور در توانمندسازی اقتصادی محلات پیراشهری زابل. کاوش‌های جغرافیایی مناطق بیابانی.15(2) صص 94-79.
بزی، خدارحم، کیانی، اکبر و صفرزایی، عبدالغنی. (1395). بررسی علل شکل­گیری و راهکار مقابله حاشیه‌نشینی شهر زابل با تأکید بر توانمندسازی. مطالعات شهری. 6 (21). صص 28-17.
بهزادفر، مصطفی، نقره‌کار، عبدالحمید، و صالحی، سیدکمیل. 1397. ارزیابی شاخص‌های توانمندسازی در سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی با رویکرد دارایی مبنا در کلانشهر تهران(نمونه موردی: محله میان‌آباد اسلام‌شهر). جغرافیا. 57(16). صص114-96
بهزادی، سجاد و جلیلی صدرآباد، سمانه. 1402. بررسی نقش دفاتر تسهیلگری و توسعه محلی در توانمندسازی محدوده­های هدف توسعه (نمونه مطالعاتی: محله ناصرخسرو اصفهان). جغرافیا و توسعة فضای شهری. 10(1)، صص 173-157.
پوراحمد، احمد، زیاری، کرامت الله و حمیدی، اکبر. 1394. سنجش کارکرد دفاتر تسهیلگری در نوسازی بافت­های فرسوده شهری (مطالعه موردی: ناحیه 4 منطقه 11 شهر تهران). فصلنامه جغرافیایی سرزمین. 47.صص 64-49.
حاج علی‌اکبری، کاوه.1390. تسهیلگری در بافت­های فرسوده شهر تهران. نشریه هفت‌تپه. 37.صص 38-25.
حکیمی، هادی، سعدلونیا، حسین و میرزایی، علی.1397. امکان‌سنجی اجرای راهبردهای توانمندسازی در ساماندهی سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی در ایران. فصلنامه راهبرد توسعه. 56.صص 163-135.
رستم زاده، یاور. 1390. ساماندهی و توانمندسازی سکونتگاه­های غیررسمی در محلات شهری با بررسی نگرش ساکنین محلی. مورد پژوهشی: محله توحید شهر بندرعباس. فصلنامه مدیریت شهری. 29.صص 336-321.
زالی، نادر، رحمتی، یوسف، و چاره، نجمه. 1394. ارزیابی و نقدی بر طرح ساماندهی و توانمندسازی سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی شیراز, مطالعه موردی محله مهدی‌آباد (کتس بس). پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری. 6(23). صص132-115
زنگانه، احمد، یوسفی بابادی، سعید و پریزادی، طاهر. 1398. برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی به‌منظور توانمندسازی محله‌های دارای فقر شهری (مطالعۀ موردی: شهرکرد). پژوهش­های جغرافیای انسانی. 51(4)صص 1049-1033.
شاطریان، محسن و صدیقه کیانی سلمی .1395. بررسی و مقایسه ابعاد توانمندسازی در بین محلات شهری (مطالعه موردی: محله پشت مشهد بالا و محله طاهر و منصور شهر کاشان). نشریه جغرافیای اجتماعی شهری. 3(8)،صص 86-63.
شاطریان، محسن، گنجی پور، محمود و اشنویی، امیر. 1392. اسکان غیر رسمی-پدیده­ای در حال گسترش در هزاره سوم. انتشارات دانشگاه کاشان. چاپ اول.
شیخی، حجت، برونک، فرهاد، زنگیشه یی، سجاد.1400. توسعه محلی و رویکرد تسهیلگری اجتماع‌محور، فصلنامه چشم­انداز شهرهای آینده. 1،صص 75-61.
کیانی سلمی، صدیقه، شاطریان، محسن، و صفری، حامد.1399. شناسایی عوامل تسهیل‌کننده توانمندسازی محله­های حاشیه­نشین شهر اصفهان (مطالعه موردی: محله عاشق‌آباد). فصلنامه پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی برنامه­ریزی شهری. 8(1)،صص 192-161.
گنجلو، عاطفه و سعیدی مفرد، ساناز. 1398. نقش سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد و تشکل‌های محلی در توانمندسازی اجتماعی سکونتگاه­های غیررسمی. فصلنامه تحقیقات جغرافیایی. 4.صص 491-483.
عباس زاده، شهاب و گوهری، حمید. 1387. توانمندسازی سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی با تکیه‌بر سرمایه اجتماعی نمونه موردی: شهر شهید باهنر مشهد. اولین کنفرانس اقتصاد شهری ایران. مشهد.صص 16-1.
محمدی دوست، سلیمان، مرادی­ریزی، مرضیه، و خانی زاده، محمدعلی. 1397. ارزیابی نقش مدیریت شهری در توانمندسازی سکونت­گاه­های فقیرنشین شهری با تأکید بر خواسته­های ساکنان. مطالعه موردی: محله زینبیه شهر اصفهان. آمایش جغرافیایی فضا. 8(29)،صص 166-147
مشیری، فرخ، صرافی، مظفر و دهبان، محبوبه. 1392. جایگاه سرمایه اجتماعی در توانمندسازی و ساماندهی اجتماعات ساکن در سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی. همایش ملی جغرافیا.شهرسازی و توسعه پایدار تهران. انجمن محیط‌زیست کومش. دانشگاه صنعت هوایی.  صص13-1
Akhmat ,G., Mahroof Khan, M. 2011. Key interventions to solve the problems of informal abodes of the third world, due to poor infrastructure. 2nd International Geography Symposium GEOMED2010. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 19: PP56–60.
Ani, F., Ramlan, N., Suhaimy, K. A. M., Jaes, L., Damin, Z. A., Halim, H., & Ahmad, S. (2018). Applying empowerment approach in community development. In Proceedings of The International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS),1 (1).
El Menshawy, A., Shafik., S.,  khedr, F. 2016. Affordable Housing as a Method for Informal Settlements Sustainable Upgrading. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Volume 223:PP126-133.
Khalifa, M.A. 2015. Evolution of informal settlements upgrading strategies in Egypt: From negligence to participatory development. Ain Shams Engineering Journal (6):PP1151-1159.
Mamdouh Nassar, D., Gamil Elsayed, H. 2018. From Informal Settlements to sustainable communities. Alexandria Engineering Journal 57:PP2367-2376.
Parikh,P. , Bisaga I., Loggia, C., Georgiadou, M.C.,Ojo-Aromokudu, J. 2020. Barriers and opportunities for participatory environmental upgrading: Case study of Havelock informal settlement, Durban.
Pilehvar, A. (2021). Spatial-geographical analysis of urbanization in Iran. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), PP1-12.‏
UN. Habitat (2003). The challenge of slums; global report on human settlements and metropolitanisation. Available at: http://www.unhabitat.org
Zhang, Q., Yung, E. H. K., & Chan, E. H. W. (2018). Towards sustainable neighborhoods: Challenges and opportunities for neighborhood planning in transitional urban China. Sustainability, 10(2),P 406.‏
Preipheral Urban Spaces Development
Volume 8, Issue 2 - Serial Number 20
Summer
Spring 2026
Pages 21-44