Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Evaluation of Gender Inequality in Women's Education and Employment and Analysis of Factors Affecting it (Case study: Villages of urban Peripheral Tabriz)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
3 PhD student in Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
Abstract
The issue of inequality is not a new concept, it has been part of global politics, and it has attracted the attentions of leaders all over the world (Akintnde,Othman.,2023: 1). also, one of the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) achieve equal rights and opportunities for both women and men in all spheres of society, eliminate discrimination on the grounds of gender and apply special measures to the balance between women’s and men’s ability to enjoy equal rights (Chornodon etal., 2022:123). However, gender inequality has come to the forefront of policy debates, not only because it deprives a basic human right, but also due to a surge in evidence that illuminates the extensive costs it incurs on society, this is why various recognized international organizations have stressed the importance of eradicating this global misfortune (Akintnde, Othman., 2023: 1).

Equality in education has always been a major concern in the field of education. Inequalities in education are manifested in many ways, mainly between regions, rural and urban areas and gender (Zhao., 2022: 831). Furthermore, Gender inequality in education has become the most influencing overall gender inequality. So, Inequality of educational background between female and male impact gender inequality in the workplace, position, role in society, as well as freedom of opinion. Also, there is a lot of empirical evidence to show that educational discrimination against women hinders the development economy and exacerbating social inequality. Efforts to reduce gender gaps in education by expanding opportunities for education for women is very profitable economically (Badriah, Istiqomah., 2022: 1). In Human society has done a lot to reduce the gender gap in healthcare and education, but it is still far from establishing equal income for women and men (Gurieva etal., 2022: 66). But can for reduce this inequality, various factors that can be effective in increasing gender inequality, including political, social, economic and cultural factors, can be identified (Sadeghlou et al., 2020: 29).



This research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of descriptive-analytical approach. In the present research, at first, the data needed for the evaluation was prepared from the relevant organization and by using statistical formulas, the indicators determined for the years 2007 and 2017 were calculated and the changes of the two periods were calculated for the aforementioned indicators. Then, using the geographic information system and interpolation tool (IDW), the location of each village in different classes is determined so that the level of gender inequality in each index can be measured at the level of all the studied villages. Then, using the entropy model, weighted the mentioned indicators and classified the studied villages in terms of gender inequality with the Vikor model. Finally, with the regression weighted geography of model, the extent of the impact of each factor on these inequalities was evaluated.



Based on the analysis, the literacy rate of women is lower than that of men, but it is not undeniable that in the 10-year period, more villages of women than men have been placed in better conditions in terms of education. Also, from the point of view of education employment rate of students, the changes of 26 villages in the 10-year period showed that in terms of this indicator, the society of men is in a more favorable situation than women. In addition, due to the low number of female workers in rural areas, Basically, the changes were too upward, and these changes caused that in 30 villages in the society of women have better conditions than men. Finally, in terms of economic participation index, it was the community of men that among the 45 villages investigated, 26 villages were in a more favorable situation in the mentioned period. Also, the results obtained from the Vikor model indicate that the village of Alvar Alia, having relatively good socio-economic conditions in the women’s community compared to the other studied villages, was able to obtain a possible score of 1.00, against the village of Karajan by obtaining the lowest score meaning 0.00, in unfavorable conditions compared to other villages. In addition, the results obtained from the weighted regression of geography indicate that the most influential factors on gender inequalities are distance from the main road, availability of educational infrastructure, distance from Tabriz city and the percentage of rural employment, which are respectively 0.712, 0.696, 0.691 and 0.647.



Based on the results and discussions, it can be acknowledged that the level of women's literacy has increased in a ten-year period, which can be effective for women's employment and participation. But the number of working women or people who want to work in rural areas is relatively small compared to the population of women, on the other hand, it is expected that by increasing the literacy rate of women, in addition to their employment, better conditions will be created in other fields and directions. However, in contrast to the high literacy rate of women, the rate of female Education employment is relatively lower, that by encouraging women towards various activities and affairs, they can be pushed towards increasing the level of higher education and strengthen their skills and empower women so that the rural society can be guided towards a successful and sustainable and all-round development. Also, the rate of employment of women has increased significantly, but the number of women seeking employment or working in the studied society was very low; because, the amount of economic participation of women in the rural society was very small, but considering the high level of literacy of the women community compared to the previous periods, it is possible to draw a principled and logical planning at the level of rural communities, to guide these communities towards sustainable development. based on the final score, the villages of Alvar Alia and Karajan have achieved the highest and lowest gender equality, respectively. Also, based on the results obtained from the factors affecting on this inequality, conditions can be provided to minimize the difference in status between men and women is as minimal as possible.
Keywords

Subjects


احمدزاده نقده، سحر. 1400. اثرات تغییر کاربری اراضی بر خدمات اکوسیستمی نواحی روستایی در طی سال‌های 1368 و 1398 (مطالعه موردی : روستاهای شهرستان تبریز). به راهنمایی دکتر محسن آقایاری‌هیر. کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه تبریز.
باستانی، سوسن و خسروی دهقی، کوثر. 1398. موانع و چالش‌های سیاست‌گذاری بر مبنای عدالت جنسیتی. مسائل اجتماعی ایران. دوره 10. شماره 2. صص 29- 57.
بخارایی، احمد و یزدخواستی، بهجت. 1393. بررسی مقایسه‌ای: موانع فرهنگی تحقق عدالت جنسیتی مطالعه موردی: زنان متأهل شهر تهران در سال‌های 1389 و 1393). مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران. دوره 3. شماره 4. صص 559- 583.
برومند، مریم و رضایی، سولماز. 1395. ارزیابی عملکرد بوستان‌های زنان در ارتقای عدالت جنسیتی در شهرهای اسلامی نمونه موردی: بوستان مادر آزادگان، منطقه 15 شهر تهران). پژوهش‌نامه زنان. پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. دوره 7. شماره 16. صص 45- 61.
بزی، خدارحم  رئیسی، اسلام. 1391. ارزیابی جایگاه و نقش زنان در فرآیند توسعه روستایی و کشاورزی ایران. همایش ملی توسعه روستایی. رشت. صص 1- 17.
جامعی، مژده، موسوی بایگی، محمد و بنایان‌اول، محمد. 1393. اعتبارسنجی برآوردهای بارندگی روزانه شبکه APHRODIT و برآوردهای حاصل از درون‌یابی مکانی بارندگی در استان خوزستان. نشریه آب‌وخاک علوم و صنایع کشاورزی. دوره 28. شماره 3. صص 626- 638.
جعفری‌نیا، غلامرضا. 1398. بررسی روابط بین عدالت اجتماعی و جنسیتی با نگرش زنان بوشهری به مردم‌سالاری. فصلنامه جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی ایران. دوره 2. شماره 1. صص 117- 146.
جوادی، مریم، هرندی، فاطمه و فلاح محسن‌خانی، زهره. 1392. تحلیل جنسیتی ثبات اشتغال در ایران. مجله‌ی بررسی‌های آمار رسمی ایران. دوره 24. شماره 1. صص 87- 107.
حاجیلو، فتانه و دادور خانی، فضیله. 1387. بررسی تأثیر نگرش مردان بر ایجاد گروه‌های مستقل زنان روستایی (مطالعه موردی استان آذربایجان شرقی). فصلنامه توسعه و روستا. دوره 11. شماره 1. صص 151- 171.
حیدری، فریبا. 1397. نقش و مشارکت زنان در توسعه پایدار. پژوهشنامه حقوق بشری (صیانت از حقوق زنان سابق). سال 3. شماره 11. صص 99- 115.
خانی، فضیله. 1389. چارچوب تحلیلی در مطالعات نابرابری‌های جنسیتی در جهان. زن در توسعه و سیاست (پژوهش زنان). دوره 8. شماره 3. صص 7- 30.
خسروی‌پور، بهمن و فروشانی، ناهید. 1390. مشارکت زنان و توسعه پایدار روستایی. نشریه کار و جامعه. شماره 132، 133. صص 56- 68.
رضایی، مهرانگیز. 1400. بررسی تغییرات فضایی- زمانی شاخص اشتغال زنان در نواحی روستایی استان اصفهان 1375- 1390). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی. دوره 53. شماره 3. صص 1103- 1119.
زبیدی، حیدر، امامی، کریم، محمدی، تیمور وغفاری، فرهاد. 1400. شکاف جنسیتی دستمزد و پویایی‌های آن در بازار کار ایران. فصلنامه نظریه‌های کاربرد اقتصاد. دوره 8. شماره 3. صص 85- 112.
سالکی‌ملکی، محمدعلی. 1401. ارزیابی فضایی و بخش‌بندی بازار گردشگری شهری با رویکرد گردشگری پست‌مدرن مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهر تبریز. به راهنمایی دکتر شهریور روستایی. دکتری تخصصی. دانشگاه تبریز.
صادقلو، طاهره، خوب، شادی و صاحبی، شیرین. 1399. بررسی تأثیرات جنسیتی بر میزان مشارکت‌پذیری زنان روستایی  (منطقه موردمطالعه: دهستان گلمکان و رادکان شهرستان چناران). زن در توسعه و سیاست. دوره 18. شماره 1. صص 23- 53.
صالحی، حمید، معتمدی، محمد و مافی، عزت‌الله. 1400. اعتبارسنجی روش‌های درون‌یابی دمای فصل تابستان در شمال‌شرق ایران. نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی. دوره 21. شماره 61. صص 351- 369.
طاهونی، مهدیه. 1401. تحلیلی بر بازآفرینی محلات تاریخی- فرهنگی با رویکرد پایداری مطالعه مورد: محلات شهری بافت تاریخی- فرهنگی شهر تبریز. به راهنمایی دکتر رسول قربانی. دکتری تخصصی. دانشگاه تبریز.
عزیزی، مینا. (1399). مقایسه احساس نابرابری جنسیتی در میان اساتید زن دانشکده‌های فنی و علوم‌اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران. تهران. انتشارات پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
عطارزاده، مجتبی. 1388. عدالت جنسیتی، مرز تعامل جنسیت و سیاست. مطالعات راهبردی زنان (کتاب زنان). دوره 12. شماره 46. صص 225- 266.
فال سلیمان، محمود و حجی‌پور، محمد. 1392. واکاوی نقش زنان در توسعه محلی پایدار، رویکردی زیست‌شناختی در احیاء منابع زیست‌محیطی (مورد: تجربیات پروژه بین‌المللی ترسیب کربن در استان خراسان جنوبی). مطالعات اجتماعی روان‌شناختی زنان. دوره 11. شماره 3. صص 27- 52.
قاسمی، ابراهیم و جمالو، رقیه. 1398. بررسی عدالت جنسیتی و تأثیر آن بر اشتغال زنان. مطالعات  فقهی حقوقی زن و خانواده. دوره 2. شماره 3. صص 77- 97.
کشوری، آتنا و مرزبان، افشین. 1398. ارزیابی روش‌های درون‌یابی در پهنه‌بندی مکانی به توان در کشاورزی استان خوزستان. جغرافیا و توسعه. دوره 17. شماره 55. صص 63- 86.
ماجدی،حمید، عندلیب، علیرضا و مشارزاده مهرابی، زهرا.1394. شناسایی شاخص‌های مؤثر بر مشارکت زنان در طرح‌های توسعه شهری. باغ نظر. دوره 12. شماره 32. صص 3-12.
محمدی‌ترکمانی، حجت. 1401. تحلیلی بر زمینه‌های ساختاری رانت در سازمان مدیریت شهری ایران؛ مطالعه موردی شهرداری شهر تبریز. به راهنمایی دکتر اکبر اصغری‌زمانی. دکتری تخصصی. دانشگاه تبریز.
مظفری، افسانه. 1394. نقش رسانه‌های جمعی در توسعه پایدار با رویکرد توانمندسازی زنان. مجله مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران. دوره 7. شماره 3. صص 123- 137.
میرویسی نیک، صادق. 1394. توسعه انسانی و عدالت جنسیتی در رویکرد قابلیتی آمارتیاسن. فصلنامه مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی. دوره 7. شماره 4. صص 47- 72.
نشر مرکز آمار ایران. 1400. سالنامه آماری استان آذربایجان‌شرقی.
Akintunde, Yusef. Wasiu. & Othman, Farida. Suleiman. 2023. Does Gender Ineqiality Affect Economic Growth? IJRDO. Journal of Business Management. Vol. 7. Issue. 6. PP. 1-10.
Akurugu, Constance Awinpoka., Jatoe, Mathias Mwinlabagna, & Domapielle, Maximillian Kolbe. 2021. Empowering rural women for sustainable development through the provision of water infrastructure in north-western Ghana. World Development Perspectives. Vol. 21. 100287.‏ PP. 1-10.
Badriah, Lilis. Siti. & Istiqomah, I. 2022. Does Gender Inequality Lead to Income Inequality? Evidence from Indonesia. Ekuilibrium: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi. Vol. 17. No. 1. PP. 1-13.‏
Chornodon, Myroslava. Shevchenko, Nataliia. Fesenko, Galyna. Klymenko, Oksana. Dragan-Ivanets, Nataliya. & Zozulia, Nataliia. 2022. The Problem of Gender Inequality in Periodicals Today. Postmodern Openings. Vol. 13. No. 3. 122-133.‏
Dang, Van. Thac. & Dang, Wilson. V.T. 2019. Multi-criteria decision-making in the evaluation of environmental quality of OECD countries: the entropy weight and VIKOR methods. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. Vol.36. Issue. 1. PP. 119-130.‏
Daraz, Umer. Ahmad, Akhlaq. & Bilal, Muhammad. 2018. Gender Inequality in Education: An Analysis of Socio-Cultural Factors and Impacts on the Economic Development of Malakand, Pakistan. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ). Vol. 2. No. 2. PP. 50-58.
Gurieva, Svetlana. D., Kazantseva, Tatiana. V., Mararitsa, Larisa. V., & Gundelakh, Olga. E. 2022. Social Perceptions of gender Differences and the subjective significance of the gender inequality issue. Social psychology. Vol. 15. Issue. 2.‏ PP. 65- 82.
Handaragama, S., rathnayake, H., Uluwaduge, P. 2013. Womens Economic participation in Rural Development. International Journal of Education and research. Vol. 1. No. 8. PP. 1-18.
Keyghobadi, Melika. 2023. An Analysis of Socio-Cultural Factors Affecting Gender Inequality with a Role in Mental Health. Journal of Pharmaceutical. Vol. 14. Issue. 3. PP. 2960-2972.
Kim, Seh. Young. 2021. Determining critical factors of gender inequality: Evidence from 34 OECD and non-OECD countries. World Development Perspectives. Vol. 21. Issue. C. PP. 1-9.
Kim, Seh. Young. 2022. Analyzing the impacts of informal institutional factors affecting gender inequality: Evidence from 43 countries. World Development Perspectives. Vol. 28. Issue. C.
Krishna, Munuswamy. Kumar, Sathuvachari. Devarajan. Ezilarasan, Chakaravarthy. Sudarsan, Perumalsamy. Vishnu. Anandan, Viswanathan. Palani, Sivaprakasam. & Jayaseelan, Veerasundram. 2022. Application of MOORA & COPRAS integrated with entropy method for multi-criteria decision making in dry turning process of Nimonic C263. Manufacturing Review. Vol. 9. No. 20.‏ PP. 1-10.
Mahrouzadeh, Tayebeh. 2019. Tertiary Education of Women in Islamic Countries (OIC) and the Status of Balanced Approach. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education. Vol. 2. Issue. 1. PP. 23-39.‏
Mani, Suma. & Antony Raj, Maria. 2023. Role of families in normalizing gender inequalities.‏ Education and Society. Vol. 47. Issue. 1. No. 12. PP. 199- 206.
Mukhamedova, Nozilakhon. & Wegerich, Kai. 2018. The feminization of agriculture in post-Soviet Tajikistan. Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 57. PP. 128-139.‏
Ponthieux, Sophie. & Meurs, Dominique. 2015. Gender inequality. In Handbook of income distribution. Vol. 2. PP. 981-1146.‏ Elsevier.
Rietveld, A.M. (Anne), van der Burg, M. (Margreet), Groot, J.C.J. (Jeroen). 2020. Bridging youth and gender studies to analyse rural young women and men's livelihood pathways in Central Uganda. Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 75. PP. 152-163.
Singh, Shree Priya., Singh, Pushpendra. & Komaraiah, Jadi Bala. 2023. Gender discrimination and inequalities in education expenditure in India. International Journal of Social Economics.‏ Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. PP. 1-18.
Vaid, Sanjay. Kumar. Vaid, Gopal. Kaur, Swapandeep. Kumar, Raman. & Sidhu, Manpreet. Singh. 2022. Application of multi-criteria decision-making theory with VIKOR-WASPAS-Entropy methods: A case study of silent Genset. Materials Today: Proceedings. Vol. 50. Part. 5. PP. 2416-2423.‏
Vasconcellos, Mario. & Vasconcellos, Ana Maria. 2009. Partnership, empowerment and local development. Interações (Campo Grande). Vol. 10. No. 2. PP. 133-148.‏
Waltz, Amber. 2016. The women who feed us: Gender empowerment (or lack thereof) in rural Southern Brazil. Journal of rural studies. Vol. 47. PP. 31-40.‏
Zajda, Joseph. 2022. Discourses of Gender Inequality in Education. In Discourses of Globalisation and Education Reforms: Overcoming Discrimination. PP. 45-58. Cham: Springer International Publishing.‏
Zhao, Tianying. 2022. What are the Causes of Gender Inequality in Education in China? The 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries. USA. PP. 831-837.