Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Territorial Behavior of Residents in Marginalized Areas: Analyzing Its Impact on Housing Patterns (Case Study: Banbor, Ban Barz, Sabzi Abad Neighborhoods in Ilam Province)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Phd Student, Department of Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Department of Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
3 Assisstant Prof, Department of architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
4 south Tehran branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Nowadays, a significant number of residents in developing countries live in informal settlements. The process of urbanization, accompanied by rapid population growth in cities, has led to the formation of consequences such as informal settlements around cities and metropolises, developed outside the official development plan. Marginal neighborhoods are mostly lacking in safety, stability, social security, services, and urban infrastructure. One of the most important symbols in recognizing informal housing is the physical and structural indicators and characteristics of housing. Housing and environmental conditions are one of the most influential factors affecting people's satisfaction with living in a neighborhood. One of the concepts that affect the quality of life in settlements is the concept of territory and territorial behavior of residents. The concept of territory refers to the formation of a limited area that individuals or a group of individuals regularly and sustainably benefit from, and feel a sense of belonging and ownership towards the space. Any personalization and marking of the environment or defense against interference is considered territorial behavior. Despite the high importance of the concept of territorial behavior and its role in the physical characteristics of housing, a comprehensive study has not yet been conducted on the relationship between these concepts, especially in the context of marginal neighborhoods in Iran. In line with this goal, the marginal neighborhoods of Ilam city have been selected as one of the areas with the highest rate of marginalization in the country for field study.

Methodology

This study has been conducted using a mixed-method approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods. Since the main objective of this research is to identify the relationship between residents' territorial behavior and the physical characteristics of housing in marginal areas, the research questions have been formulated based on the nature, methodology, and background of the study. In order to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the research topic, a combination of in-depth field interviews with residents, field observations of selected housing in neighborhoods, and quantitative evaluations by architecture and urban planning experts have been used to examine this bidirectional relationship between the physical characteristics and territorial behavior of residents.

Results and discussion

A comprehensive review of theoretical studies has shown that limited research has been conducted on the physical characteristics of housing in marginal areas of Ilam city. Furthermore, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on how behavioral, social, cultural, and cognitive factors influence the formation of these physical patterns. Field visits and in-depth interviews indicate that residents, driven by self-interest, have made extensive changes to public and semi-public spaces, and due to the lack of order and regulation, this behavior has become normalized. These actions include unauthorized construction, relocation of high-pressure cables, and encroachment on public lands to create personal spaces. The findings of the research indicate that the perceptual-cognitive framework of residents plays a significant role in shaping the physical characteristics of marginal areas. Additionally, based on the findings, household economic status, social proximity such as kinship ties, and personal relationships play a crucial role in the formation and location of houses in these neighborhoods.Experts have emphasized the strong correlation between housing affordability, housing and economic issues, and the cost of construction in central areas of the city when explaining the physical characteristics of housing in marginal areas based on residents' territorial behavior. Furthermore, environmental factors, access to services, and personal relationships are among the most influential criteria in defining the physical characteristics of housing in marginal areas. Based on the findings, principles of interior aesthetics, order, law enforcement, spatial compatibility with residents' needs and desires, have the lowest average rank and importance in defining the physical characteristics of housing based on residents' territorial behavior. Additionally, among the main concepts, the economic concept has the highest average rank. The results of the correlation analysis show that perceptual and physical concepts have the highest mutual influence, indicating that perceptual concepts such as privacy and security play a significant role in shaping the physical patterns of housing in marginal areas. Perceptual criteria can be considered one of the key criteria in the formation of the physical patterns of housing in marginal areas based on residents' territorial behavior.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it can be inferred that the physical characteristics of housing and residents' territorial behavior in marginal areas have a close and bidirectional relationship, playing a significant role in shaping the design patterns of housing in these areas. The findings of this research highlight the importance of considering residents' territorial behaviors, cultural beliefs, social relationships, mindset, and attitudes, as well as their economic status and income level, in the design of residential environments. Architects and urban designers should pay attention to the territorial behavior and the significance of these concepts for residents in designing the physical characteristics of housing in these areas. By considering the needs and desires of residents, they can create safe, comfortable, and functional living spaces that cater to the specific requirements of the inhabitants.
Keywords

Subjects


انصاری، مجتبی، جمشیدی، سمانه، و الماسی فر، نینا. 1389. بررسی حس قلمرو و رفتار قلمروپایی در پارک‌های شهری (مطالعه موردی: پارک ساعی). معماری و شهرسازی آرمان شهر، 3(4)،صص 33-48.
اهری، زهرا.1370. مسکن  حداقل، تهران :مرکز تحقیقات ساختمان و مسکن، صص7.
بمانیان، محمدرضا. دهقان، نگار. زارع، زهرا. یگانه، منصور.1400. تبیین رابطه خوانایی فضا با میزان رفتار قلمروپایی شهروندان در پارک‌های شهری. هویت شهر، 15(4)،صص 20-4.
پیران، پرویز.1381. بازهم در باب اسکان غیررسمی، شیرآباد زاهدان، مجله هفت شهر، صص 24-7.
پیران، پرویز.1387. از اسکان غیررسمی تا اسکان نایابی(در جستجوی راه‌حل)، مجله هفت شهر، شماره 23 و 24، صص 30-14.
ترکمن­نیا، نعیمه. قربانی، رسول. خوارزمی، امیدعلی.1397. ارزیابی سیستمی عوامل شکل‌گیری و گسترش سکونتگاه‌های غیر‌رسمی کلانشهر مشهد. جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 5(2)، صص 23-42.
جاوید، ساره. صحاف، خسرو.1394. بررسی الگوهای طراحی مؤثر در جهت ارتقا کیفی زندگی جمعی در مجتمع‌های مسکونی،کنفرانس بین المللی پژوهش در علوم و تکنولوژی.
حکیمی، هادی، زاد ولی، فاطمه و شاهرخ زادولی خواجه. 1395. بررسی رابطة بین کیفیت مسکن و سرمایة روان‌شناختی در سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی(مطالعة موردی: محلة یوسف‌آباد تبریز)، پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دوره 4، شماره 1.صص 134- 117.
حنیفه، فاطمه، رشیدکلویر، حجت اله، کاسه گرمحمدی، شعیب، و ابوالقاسمی، عباس. 1397. پیش‌بینی تمایلات اجتماعی بر اساس شاخص‌های قلمرو گرایی در ساکنین مجتمع‌های مسکونی شهر رشت. معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، 6(2)،صص 85-96.
سلاورزی زاده، محمد. شیخی، حجت. حاتمی، شهین. 1400. شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر توسعه مسکن اجتماعی با تأکید بر آینده‌نگاری (مورد شناسی: شهر ایلام). جغرافیا و آمایش شهری منطقه‌ای.11(39)،صص 224-119.
شاهرودی کلور، مرضیه. موحد، خسرو. رشیدکلویر، حجت الله. تقی پورر، ملیحه. 1401. بررسی تأثیر قلمروپایی در مسکن بر انگیزه بروز رفتار پایدار بر اساس تئوری ارزش فضایی (موردمطالعه: مجتمع‌های مسکونی شهر شیراز). جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری.10(3).صص 109-89.
شفیعی، سعید .1393. طراحی مجتمع مسکونی در رشت تأملی پیرامون انطباق قلمرو ذهنی و عینی در مجتمع‌های مسکونی، دانشگاه گیلان، دانشکده معماری و هنر.
شمس، مجید، گمار، مونا.1394.ارزیابی شاخص‌های کمی و کیفی مسکن در استان همدان (با تأکید بر اقشار کم‌درآمد)، برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای (دانشگاه آزاد مرودشت) سال پنجم، شماره 20، صص56.
شیخی، حجت.1397. تحلیل توان‌های محیطی برای توسعه شهری(مطالعه موردی: شهر ایلام)، پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، دوره 50، شماره 1. صص 127- 144.
صرافی، مظفر.1387. ساماندهی سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی کشور در پرتو حکمروایی خوب شهری، هفت شهر، شماره 23 و 24، صص 14-4.
صرافی، مظفر.1381. به‌سوی نظریه‌ای برای ساماندهی اسکان غیررسمی ، از حاشیه‌نشینی تا متن شهرنشینی، مجله هفت شهر، دوره 1، شماره 8، صص 11-5.
قرخلو، مهدی. مهدی، علی. مهدیان بهنمیری، معصومه.1391. بررسی شاخص‌های اجتماعی - اقتصادی و تأثیر آن بر کیفیت مساکن محلات حاشیه‌نشین (مطالعه موردی: محله حاشیه‌نشین شیخ‌آباد شهر قم). مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی سکونتگاه‌های انسانی (چشم‌انداز جغرافیایی)، 7(18)،صص 18-41.
محسنی، رضا علی.1389. مسئله حاشیه‌نشینی و اسکان غیررسمی با تأکید بر توانمندسازی آن،جغرافیای انسانی سال دوم، صص 134.
محمدی، سوده و فروتن، منوچهر.1395. بررسی حس قلمرو و رفتار قلمروپایی در فضاهای مسکونی،سومین کنفرانس علمی پژوهشی افق‌های نوین در علوم جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی معماری و شهرسازی ایران،تهران.
معتضدیان، فهیمه، و مطلبی، قاسم.1393. قلمروپایی در سکونتگاه‌های دانشجویی (مطالعه موردی: خوابگاه فاطمیه کوی دانشگاه تهران). هویت شهر، 8(17)، صص 55-64.
ملک حسینی، عباس، و جودکی، حمیدرضا. (1388. بررسی و ساماندهی محله‌های حاشیه‌نشین در ایران (نمونه موردی: اراک, محله باغ خلج). جغرافیا، 3(11)،صص 147-174.
ملکی, سعید, عسگری, مریم.1398. بررسی وضعیت شاخص‌های کمّی و کیفی اجتماعی و دسترسی مسکن در سطح محلات حاشیه‌نشین شهری (مطالعه موردی؛ محلات بان برز، بان بور و سبزی آباد شهر ایلام). فصل‌نامه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری چشم‌انداز زاگرس.11(39). صص 201-177.
میرکتولی، جعفر، آریان کیا، مصطفی.1396.بررسی مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار در شکل‌گیری کالبد مسکن شهری از دیدگاه گونه شناسی با تأکید بر تراکم ساختمانی و تعداد طبقات (مطالعه موردی: شهر گرگان)، نشریه مطالعات نواحی شهر، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، سال چهارم، شماره 1، (علمی-پژوهشی) صص 131 تا 148.
Abdullah, A., Hedayati Marzbali, M., Ramayah, T., Bahauddin, A., & Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J. 2016. Territorial functioning and fear of crime: Testing for mediation in structural equation modelingSecurity Journal29, 461-484.
Altman, I. 1975. The Environment and social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space. Territory, Crowding, Brooks/Clos
Altman, I. 1975. The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding.
Alvarez, M., & Ruiz-Tagle, J. 2022. The symbolic (re) production of marginality: Social construction, internalization, and concrete consequences of territorial stigmatization in a poor neighborhood of Santiago de Chile. Housing Studies, 1-24.
Asmal, I., Gani, P. J. A., Amri, N., & Walenna, M. A. 2023. Spatial Territoriality Characteristics in a Waterfront Slum Settlement (Case Study: Karabba Village, Makassar). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1134, No. 1, p. 012008). IOP Publishing.
Baxter, A. J., Tweed, E. J., Katikireddi, S. V., & Thomson, H. 2019. Effects of Housing First approaches on health and well-being of adults who are homeless or at risk of homelessness: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Epidemiol Community Health73(5), 379-387.
Brown, G., & Zhu, H. 2016. My workspace, not yours’: The impact of psychological ownership and territoriality in organizationsJournal of environmental psychology48, 54-64.
Brunson, L., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. 2001. Resident appropriation of defensible space in public housing: Implications for safety and communityEnvironment and Behavior33(5), 626-652
Casimir, M. J. 2021. The dimensions of territoriality: an introduction. In Mobility and territoriality (pp. 1-26). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. 2009. Mapping the field of mixed methods researchJournal of mixed methods research3(2), 95-108.
Farkisch, H., Ahmadi, V., & Che-Ani, A. I. 2015. Evaluation of neighborhood center attributes on resident’s territoriality and sense of belonging a case study in Boshrooyeh, IranHabitat International49, 56-64.
Greenberg, S. W., Rohe, W. M., & Williams, J. R. 1982. Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoodsPopulation and environment5(3), 141-165
Huang, J., Mori, S., & Nomura, R. 2019. Territorial Cognition, Behavior, and Space of Residents: A Comparative Study of Territoriality between Open and Gated Housing Blocks; a Case Study of Changchun, ChinaSustainability11(8), 2332.
Mousavinia, S. F., Pourdeihimi, S., & Madani, R. 2019. Housing layout, perceived density and social interactions in gated communities: Mediational role of territorialitySustainable Cities and Society51, 101699.
Nakamura, S. 2016. Revealing invisible rules in slums: The nexus between perceived tenure security and housing investmentHabitat International53, 151-162.
Reynald, D. M., & Elffers, H. 2009. The future of Newman's Defensible Space Theory: Linking Defensible Space and the routine activities of placeEuropean Journal of Criminology6(1), 25-46.
Rollwagen, H. 2016. The relationship between dwelling type and fear of crimeEnvironment and Behavior48(2), 365-387.
Surya, B., Saleh, H., Suriani, S., Sakti, H. H., Hadijah, H., & Idris, M. 2020. Environmental pollution control and sustainability management of slum settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land9(9), 279.
UN-Habitat .2013. The State of the World Cities Report, Prosperity of Cities, pp 149
Vartiainen, P. 1987. The strategy of territorial integration in regional development: Defining territorialityGeoforum18(1), 117-126.
Vietinghoff, C. 2021. An intersectional analysis of barriers to cycling for marginalized communities in a cycling-friendly French City. Journal of transport geography, 91, 102967.
Watt, P. 2020. Territorial stigmatisation and poor housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’. Social Inclusion8(1), 20-33.
Westaway, M. S. 2006. A longitudinal investigation of satisfaction with personal and environmental quality of life in an informal South African housing settlement, Doornkop, SowetoHabitat International30(1), 175-189.
Wortley, R., & McFarlane, M. 2011. The role of territoriality in crime prevention: A field experimentSecurity Journal24, 149-156.