Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

Preipheral Urban Spaces Development

The transformation of rural settlements adjacent to metropolises: a meta-analysis study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Student of Human Geography Group, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor Human Geography Dep., Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction

Rural settlements around urban centers (especially megacities) have more changes and transformations in various environmental-ecological, social-cultural, human, economic, physical and institutional-management fields and dimensions (changes in land use, composition and texture of the population, employment structure, rural activity and production system, spatial structure and spatial organization, etc.) compared to other rural settlements, which over time causes the existence of new entities and transformations in many existing identities. In recent decades, the unplanned growth and expansion of such settlements with their specific physical-spatial developments have been a kind of problem or problem that creates the basis for all kinds of crises and facility anomalies, economic damages, environmental pollution, low security pollution, degradation of rural activity foundations, etc. With scientific and documented research and knowledge of the factors of creating such spaces, it is possible to plan in order to overcome risky behaviors and prevent possible damages. From this point of view, the following article, by presenting a comprehensive and integrated approach through meta-analysis quantitative research method and reviewing the research literature in the field of understanding the transformation of rural settlements in metropolitan areas on the one hand, seeks to, by examining the general characteristics of these studies, their nature to It has been analyzed in terms of different dimensions in order to identify the study gaps in this field and realize the necessary platforms to eliminate these gaps and shortcomings in future researches. On the other hand, it tries to answer the following questions by carefully examining the research done:

1. What transformations have rural settlements in metropolitan areas undergone in the space-time process?

2. What are the effective factors in the transformation of rural settlements in metropolitan areas?

3. What are the ways to overcome the challenges of rural settlements in metropolitan areas?

Methodology

The method of this research is based on meta-analysis and a systematic search of sources based on related keywords was carried out in domestic and foreign scientific databases. In order to select suitable and quality scientific researches for meta-analysis, studies were screened and finally 40 documents were selected. Then ATLAS.ti software was used to analyze the collected data based on grounded theory.

Results and discussion

In this section, the research findings are presented in the form of two axes, including the methodological dimension of the studies (type of research, research approach, data collection method) and the content dimension of the studies (research questions, key axes of the studies).

Methodological aspect of the studies: The results of the evaluation of the articles show that mainly the studies conducted in the field of transformation of rural settlements in metropolitan areas, 70% have been done with a quantitative method. 18% of the studies in this field had qualitative methods and only a few studies, 12%, were based on mixed methods. A significant number (93%) have limited themselves to descriptive-analytical titles in their studies, and only a few articles (7%) have been conducted with a comparative analysis approach. Document-library method (45%) and questionnaire (31%) are the main tools in data collection and less than interview tool (24%) are used to collect information.

The content dimension of the studies: in addition to exploring what metamorphoses are, all the studies have also analyzed why these metamorphoses occur. Among the mentioned studies, a small number (9%) were based on the question of how, in addition to what and why, and were limited to providing solutions and suggestions to face the developments of such rural settlements. : Based on the analyzes conducted with the help of content analysis method, a significant part of the studies (49%) have studied the variable of inefficiency of the body tissue in understanding the transformation of rural settlements in metropolitan areas. State-oriented variables and the high level of inter-settlement interactions (17%) have contributed the most to the transformation of rural settlements in metropolitan areas. The development of institutional capacity is a solution proposed by the researchers of previous studies, which was presented in order to overcome the challenges of rural settlements in metropolitan areas.

Conclusion

The results show that most of the researches are descriptive-analytical, which are based on quantitative methods, and less qualitative and mixed methods are used in this type of studies. In this field, qualitative and mixed methods should be increased in the methodological space of studies. The number of studies in the field of rural settlements in metropolitan areas is also associated with a decreasing trend. Perhaps the decreasing trend can be related to the nature of the difficulty of studies in this field. Most of the studies in this field have gone beyond what and considered why; But the reasons and factors governing the metamorphoses have been mainly examined superficially, and there is a need to conduct a deeper investigation of the reasons and analysis of the driving factors. So it is clear that most of the studies in this field have focused on identifying the current situation (identifying factors and processes); Without paying attention to what should be (how). Therefore, in future researches, by strengthening such weaknesses, study questions, especially the "how question", require more attention, which should be selected and investigated with great sensitivity and based on the study gaps in this field.
Keywords

Subjects


احمدی دهرشید، عاطفه. 1396. تبیین تحولات اقتصاد فضای ناحیه پیراشهری سنندج. رساله دکتری رشته جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، اساتید راهنما دکتر محمدتقی رهنمایی و دکتر حسن افراخته، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی.
احمدی، سودابه. صادقلو، طاهره و شایان، حمید. 1398. تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر تغییر منظر کالبدی روستاهای حاشیه کلان‌شهرها (موردمطالعه: روستاهای حاشیه شمالی کلان‌شهر مشهد). فصلنامه پژوهش‌‌های روستایی، (4)10،صص 697-684. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2019.275886.1330.697
افراخته، حسن. 1389. روستانشینی شهری و بحران محیطی (مورد: رباط‌کریم). فصلنامه مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهری و منطقه‌ای، (4)1،صص 58-37.
افراخته، حسن. 1399. بایسته‌های ساختاری توسعه در نواحی روستایی ایران. چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات قومس.
افراخته، حسن و عزیزپور، فرهاد. 1393. تبیین تحولات مکانی- فضایی روستاهای پیرامون شهرها. مجموعه مقالات همایش توسعه پایدار کالبدی-فضایی روستایی: مسکن و بهسازی روستایی، اردبیل: انتشارات معاونت عمران روستایی،صص 134-113.
افراخته، حسن. عزیزپور، فرهاد و زمانی، محدثه. 1394. پیوندهای کلان‌شهری و تحولات کالبدی-فضایی روستاهای پیرامون (مطالعه موردی: دهستان محمدآباد کرج). فصلنامه مسکن و محیط روستا، (150)34،صص 120-101.
افراخته، حسن. عزیزپور، فرهاد. شیرخانی آزاد، حمید و مؤمنی، حسن. 1401. چشم‌انداز تحولات کالبدی-فضایی روستاهای پیرامون شهر ابهر. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های جغرافیای اقتصادی، (8)3،صص 54-37.
پوریان، افسانه. صفرزائی، عبدالواحد و براهوئی اول، مهدی. 1399. بررسی نقش شهر زاهدان در تحولات کالبدی-فضایی روستاهای پیرامون (موردمطالعه: روستاهای بخش مرکزی شهرستان زاهدان). فصلنامه پژوهش‌های نوین علوم جغرافیایی معماری و شهرسازی، (25) 3،صص 140-113.
جلالیان، حمید. شوقی، مرضیه و عزیزپور، فرهاد. 1399. تزاحم فضایی در نواحی روستایی پیرامون کلان‌شهر تهران (نمونه پژوهش: بخش رودبار قصران). فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی فضایی، (4)10،صص 112-86.  doi:20.1001.1.22287485.1399.10.4.5.  
دارویی، پرستو و کشانی همدانی، مینا. 1401. واکاوی دگردیسی نقش غالب اقتصادی در روستاهای پیرامون کلان‌شهر اصفهان. فصلنامه توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، (1) 4،صص 166-145.  doi:20.1001.1.26764164.1401.4.1.8.9
رفیعیان، مجتبی. شاه‌حسینی، گلاره و داداش پور، هاشم. 1401. فراتحلیل مطالعات حوزه مناطق کلان‌شهری در ایران. فصلنامه معماری و شهرسازی آرمان‌شهر، 38،صص 270-247. doi:10.22034/aaud.2022.264906.2392
رهنمایی، محمدتقی. 1369. توسعه تهران و دگرگونی در ساختارهای نواحی روستایی اطراف. فصلنامه تحقیقات جغرافیایی، 16،صص 53-24.
سعیدی، عباس و احمدی، منیژه. 1390. شهرگی و دگردیسی ساختاری-کارکردی خانه‌های روستایی (مورد: روستاهای پیرامون شهر زنجان). فصلنامه جغرافیا، (31) 9،صص 32-7.
سعیدی، عباس و ایمانی، بهرام. 1393. نقش عوامل و نیروهای درونی و بیرونی در روند دگردیسی کالبدی-فضایی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی پیرامون شهر اردبیل. فصلنامه جغرافیا (انجمن جغرافیای ایران)، (40) 12،صص 28-7.
سعیدی، عباس و حسینی حاصل، صدیقه. 1386. ادغام کلان‌شهری سکونتگاه‌های روستایی با نگاهی به کلان‌شهر تهران و پیرامون. فصلنامه جغرافیا. (5) 12 و 13،صص 18-7.
شادی طلب، ژاله و بیات، مجتبی.1390. نوسازی فرهنگی در روستاهای در حال گذار. فصلنامه رفاه اجتماعی، (43)11،صص 179-157.
شادی طلب، ژاله. ایمانی جاجرمی، حسین و بیات، مجتبی.1390. تحلیل جامعه‌شناختی از ویژگی‌های روستاهای در حال گذار در منطقه کلان‌شهری تهران. فصلنامه بررسی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، (6 و 5) 2،صص 39-23.
شکوئی، حسین. 1399. دیدگاه‌های نو در جغرافیای شهری. جلد اول، چاپ بیستم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
شیخی، محمد. 1380. تبیین فرایند شکل‌گیری و دگرگونی سکونتگاه‌های خودروی پیرامون کلان‌شهر تهران-مطالعه موردی اسلامشهر، نسیم شهر و گلستان. رساله دکتری رشته شهرسازی، استاد راهنما دکتر اسفندیار خراط زبردست، دانشکده هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران.
کاظمی چمسورک، زینب. 1398. تبیین تحولات ساختاری-کارکردی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی در حال گذار شهرستان ایوان طی دوره زمانی 1390-1365. رساله دکتری رشته جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، اساتید راهنما دکتر حمید جلالیان و دکتر فرهاد عزیزپور، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی.
گلی، علی. 1383. تحلیل فرایند گذار از روستا به شهر و طراحی مدلی برای شناسایی روستاهای در حال گذار در ایران. رساله دکتری رشته جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، استاد راهنما دکتر علی عسگری، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
مهندسین مشاور آمایش و توسعه البرز. 1400. طرح تهیه و تدوین برنامه آمایش استان تهران (بخش تحلیل نظام شهری استان). تهران: انتشارات معاونت برنامه‌ریزی استانداری تهران.
میکانیکی، جواد. کیمیایی، رضا و اشرفی، علی. 1401. تحلیل فضایی تغییرات کاربری اراضی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی پیراشهری بیرجند. فصلنامه روستا و توسعه پایدار فضا، (2) 3،صص 139-121. doi:10.22077/vssd.2022.5212.1099
Batisani, N & Yarnal, B. 2009. Urban expansion in Centre County, Pennsylvania: Spatial dynamics and landscape transformations. Applied Geography, 29(2): 235-249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.08.007.
Bench, S & Day, T. 2010. The user experience of critical care discharges: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. International journal of nursing studies, 47(4), 487-499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.013.
Briassoulis, H. 2000. Analysis of land use change in villages around megacities: Theoretical and Modeling approaches. West Virginia university. www.rri.wvu.edu/web book/Briassoulis/chpter4.
Chapin, F. S. 1995. Rural-Urban Land Use Chang. Urbana university of Illinois: Champing Publications. Doctor of Philosophy. The University of Guelph.
Cohen, A. 2006. Urbanization in China and the Case of Fujian Province. Modern China, 32 (1), 99-130. doi:10.1177/0097700405283503.
Douglass, M. 2018. A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural-urban linkages: an agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia. In The Earthscan reader in rural–urban linkages, Routledge, 124-154. doi:10.3828/twpr.20.1.f2827602h503k5j6
Doygun, H. 2005. Urban development in Adana, Turkey, and its environmental consequences. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 62(4): 391-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230500196153.
Eppler, U., Fritsche, R., & Laaks, S. 2015. Urban-Rural Linkages and Global Sustainable Land Use. Berlin, Globalands.
Fang, C., & Yu, D. 2017. Urban agglomeration: An evolving concept of an emerging phenomenon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 162, 126–136. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.014.
Hettne, B. 1999. Globalization and the New Regionalism: The Second Great Transformation. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Hlaváček, P., Kopáček, M., & Horáčková, L. 2019. Impact of Suburbanisation on Sustainable Development of Settlements in Suburban Spaces: Smart and New Solutions. journal Sustainability, 11(24): 2-18, 7182. doi:10.3390/su11247182.
Iaquinta, D. L., & Drescher, A. W. 2000. Defining the Peri-Urban: Rural-Urban Linkages and -Institutional Connections. Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives, 2: 3-26.
jokish, B. 2002. Migration and agricultural change in urban villages: the case of smallholder agricultural in highland Ecuador. Human Ecology, 30:523-550. doi:10.1023/A:1021198023769.
Karl, T. L. 2007. Oil-led development: social, political, and economic consequences. Encyclopedia of energy, 4(8), 661-672. doi:10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00550-7
Khorasani, M., & Zarghamfard, M. 2018. Analyzing the Impacts of Spatial Factors on Livability of Peri-Urban Villages. Soc Indic Res 136: 693–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1546-4.
Liu, Y., He, S., Wu, F., & Webster, C. 2010. Urban villages under China’s rapid urbanization: Unregulated assets and transitional neighbourhoods. Habitat International, 34(2): 135–144. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.08.003.
Lopez, E., Bocco, G., Menduza, M., Valzquez, A., & Aguirre Rivera, J. R. 2006. Peasant emigration and land ـ use change at the watershed level: A GIS- based in Central Mexico. Agricultural Systems 90:62 -78.
Losch, B., Fréguin‐Gresh, S., White, É. T., Bélières, J. F., & Giordano, T. 2011. Rural Transformation and Late Developing Countries in a Globalizing World. A Comparative Analysis of Rural Change. Final Report of the RuralStruc Program, Revised Version. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Malaque, I. R., & Yokohari, M. 2007. Urbanization process and the changing agricultural landscape pattern in the urban fringe of Metro Manila, Philippines. Environment and Urbanization, 19(1), 191-206. doi:10.1177/0956247807076782.
Marsden, T. K., & Arce, A. 1995. Constructing Quality: Emerging Food Networks in the Rural Transition. Environment and Planning A, 27(8), 1261-1279. https://doi.org/10.1068/a271261.
Maxwell, J. A. 2012. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.
Oostrum, M. 2021. Access, density and mix of informal settlement: Comparing urban villages in China and India. Journal of Cities, 117, 103334. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103334.
Rahnama, M. R. 2021. Forecasting land-use changes in the villages around Mashhad Metropolitan area using Cellular Automata and Markov chain model for 2016-2030. Journal Pre-proof, Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102548. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102548.
Ramsey, R. D. 1997. Changes in Rural Community Well-Being: A Case of the Tobacco-Belt. Southern Ontario. PhD diss., University of Guelph.
Simon, D., McGregor, D., & Nsiah-Gyabaah, K. 2004. The changing urban-rural interface of African cities: definitional issues and an application to Kumasi, Ghana. Environment and urbanization, 16(2), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600214.
Tacoli, C. 2003. The link a between urban and rural development. Journal of Environment and Urbanization, 15(1): 3-12, doi:10.1177/095624780301500111.
Tan, M., & Li, X. 2013. The changing settlements in rural areas under urban pressure in China: Patterns, driving forces and policy implications. journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 120: 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.016.
Tang, W. S., & Chung, H. 2002. Rural–urban transition in China: illegal land use and construction. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 43(1): 43-62. doi:10.1111/1467-8373.00157
United Nations. 2018. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. journal of World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, CD-ROM Edition, available through the website: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/ WUP 2018-Report.pdf
Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Li, T. 2016. The spatio-temporal patterns of urban–rural development transformation in China since 1990. Habitat International, 53, 178–187. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.011.
Xiao, H., Liu, Y., Li, L., Yu, Zh., & Zhang, X. 2018. Spatial Variability of Local Rural Landscape Change under Rapid Urbanization in Eastern China. International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(231): 2-16. Doi: 10.3390/ijgi7060231.
Xu, J., & Takahashi, M. 2020. Progressing vulnerability of the immigrants in an urbanizing village in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00914-8.
Zhou, G., He, Y., Tang, C., Yu, T., Xiao, G., & Zhong, T. 2013. Dynamic mechanism and present situation of rural settlement evolution in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(3): 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1025-7.
Zhou, J., Hou, Q., & Dong, W. 2019. Spatial Characteristics of Population Activities in Suburban Villages Based on Cellphone Signaling Analysis. journal Sustainability, 11(7): 2-19, 2159. doi:10.3390/su11072159.